Re: Site-to-Site VPN to Opnsense

2024-02-19 Thread Nux
Thanks for solving this and sharing the solution! BTW, the pictures were not sent, perhaps try to "paste" them in rather than "attach" them to the email. On 2024-02-19 20:42, Wally B wrote: Got this resolved! The issue is the way StrongSwan (OPNSense IPSec Provider) manages Phase 2 selector

Re: Site-to-Site VPN to Opnsense

2024-02-19 Thread Wally B
Got this resolved! The issue is the way StrongSwan (OPNSense IPSec Provider) manages Phase 2 selectors. For the future if anyone runs into this. Just add your networks into CloudStack like the documentation says to do. Then in your OPNSense config add additional networks to Manual SPD entries unde

Re: Site-to-Site VPN to Opnsense

2024-02-19 Thread Wally B
Tried to change the phase 2 selector at 172.16.192.0/16 to a network on the firewall directly (not just a route the firewall knows). Getting the same error. cat /var/log/daemon.log | grep 10.2.200.0/23 === Feb 19 03:45:10 r-407-VM ipsec[174957]: 07[CFG] unable to install

Re: SITE TO SITE VPN ERROR IN OUR ENVIRONMENT with CLOUDSTACK-4.3.1 AND XENSERVER 6.2

2016-06-01 Thread Marc-Andre Jutras
Hi Venkat, You can also check on your VPC if there's any IPSEC negociation errors there... log on your VPC and check in : /var/log/cloud.log /var/log/daemon.log Marcus On 2016-06-01 9:45 AM, Timothy Lothering wrote: Hi Venkat, IPSEC VPN is established with the VPC (in your case the /16). Yo

RE: SITE TO SITE VPN ERROR IN OUR ENVIRONMENT with CLOUDSTACK-4.3.1 AND XENSERVER 6.2

2016-06-01 Thread Timothy Lothering
Hi Venkat, IPSEC VPN is established with the VPC (in your case the /16). Your Tier (/24) is in this supernet, so you should be able to route to it once the tunnel is up. Make sure to specify the supernet (/16) on the remote VPN appliance as the destination. -Original Message- From: Ven

RE: Site-To-Site VPN

2016-01-20 Thread Sonali Jadhav
Aha! thx /Sonali -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 1:47 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Site-To-Site VPN On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Sonali Jadhav wrote: > Hi, > > In order to setup Site-To

Re: Site-To-Site VPN

2016-01-20 Thread Erik Weber
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Sonali Jadhav wrote: > Hi, > > In order to setup Site-To-Site VPN, do I need to add VPC first? > > Yes, Site to Site VPN is a VPC feature. -- Erik

Re: site-to-site vpn

2014-05-14 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Hi Paul, 192.168.1.0/16 and 192.168.2.0/16 are not valid CIDR. 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24 will work Le mardi 13 mai 2014, Paul Angus a écrit : > Hi, > > > > I’m trying to create a site-to-site VPN but the CIDR entry: > 192.168.1.0/16,192.168.2.0/16 is being returned as invalid. > > >

RE: site-to-site vpn

2014-05-14 Thread Paul Angus
ng the comma to separate. Regards Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] Sent: 14 May 2014 12:27 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: site-to-si

Re: site-to-site vpn

2014-05-14 Thread Daan Hoogland
Paul, I don't think this is the answer but did you notice that 192.168.1.0/16 and 192.168.2.0/16 are actually the same cidr? You are passing the same address space twice. On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi, > > > > I’m trying to create a site-to-site VPN but the CIDR entry

Re: site-to-site vpn

2014-05-14 Thread Paul Angus
ng the comma to separate. Regards, Paul Angus S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com> Original message From: Daan Hoogland Date:14/05/2014 07:55 (GMT+00:00) To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject:

Re: Site to Site VPN

2013-08-30 Thread Dean Kamali
: CSG - Ashley Lester [mailto:ash...@computer-services.com.au] > >Sent: Thursday, 29 August 2013 11:13 AM > >To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > >Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN > > > >Hi Dean, > > > >If you have some time to test this that would be fantastic, I

Re: Site to Site VPN

2013-08-30 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
Lester [mailto:ash...@computer-services.com.au] >Sent: Thursday, 29 August 2013 11:13 AM >To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN > >Hi Dean, > >If you have some time to test this that would be fantastic, I have spent >a few hours on it myself and I believ

RE: Site to Site VPN

2013-08-29 Thread Yong Chen
We have 10 sonicwall IPsec VPNs running at the same time in our setup. So far it works fine. Yong -Original Message- From: CSG - Ashley Lester [mailto:ash...@computer-services.com.au] Sent: Thursday, 29 August 2013 11:13 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN

RE: Site to Site VPN

2013-08-28 Thread CSG - Ashley Lester
l.com] Sent: August-29-13 9:28 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN I have 2 sonicwalls in production, I guess I can give it try and let you guys know, I went over Dell docs and its seems possible but I still need see it working to confirm. On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:

Re: Site to Site VPN

2013-08-28 Thread Dean Kamali
I have 2 sonicwalls in production, I guess I can give it try and let you guys know, I went over Dell docs and its seems possible but I still need see it working to confirm. On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:07 PM, CSG - Ashley Lester < ash...@computer-services.com.au> wrote: > Hello, > > Has anyone had