Re: SSVM unable to connect to SecStorage via Storage Network

2023-02-28 Thread Antoine Boucher
Yes, Physical 1 Management is on cloudbr0 Storage on cloubr53 Physical 2 Guest and Public on cloudbr1 > On Feb 27, 2023, at 10:11 PM, Simon Weller wrote: > > Antoine, > > When you defined the zone, did you place storage on its own traffic label? > > Could you share your zone network con

Re: SSVM unable to connect to SecStorage via Storage Network

2023-02-27 Thread Simon Weller
Antoine, When you defined the zone, did you place storage on its own traffic label? Could you share your zone network config, along with your traffic labels and the associated services on each label? -Si On Mon, Feb 27, 2023, 9:03 PM Antoine Boucher wrote: > Following to my previous message

SSVM unable to connect to SecStorage via Storage Network

2023-02-27 Thread Antoine Boucher
Following to my previous message I have decided to simplify my observations. Looking at the SSVM network and routing. My storage ip is defined on eth3 but the routing of the storage subnet is configured via eth1, the Management Network. Is this an oversight or a desired behaviour? The only wa