RE: VM per HOST?

o:uabstarn...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mindaugas Milinavicius Sent: Wednesday, 13 April 2016 2:49 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: VM per HOST? Very big thanks for Timothy:) And left last choice E5-2650v4 or E5-2630v4 Price different ±80%, effectivity - ±10% only. Ofcourse, 2650 have

Re: VM per HOST?

--Original Message- > From: Timothy Lothering [mailto:tlother...@datacentrix.co.za] > Sent: 13 April 2016 09:42 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: VM per HOST? > > Hi Mindaugas, > > As per previous responses, the trend is to keep to memory as you base > benchmark

RE: VM per HOST?

To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM per HOST? Hi Mindaugas, As per previous responses, the trend is to keep to memory as you base benchmark for VM density, from personal experience, memory is always the limiting factor. vCPUs are rarely a bottleneck for general workloads (there are

RE: VM per HOST?

tion has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. -Original Message- From: Mindaugas Milinavičius [mailto:uabstarn...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 13 April 2016 10:00 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM per HOST? Server/blade

RE: VM per HOST?

starn...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 April 2016 09:00 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: VM per HOST? Server/blade is HBA 8Gb FC connectivity with switch. Its more then enough:) 13 апр. 2016 г. 10:57 пользователь "Paul Angus" написал: > I'd agree with that. Memory is nearly always t

RE: VM per HOST?

, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > -Original Message- > From: uabstarn...@gmail.com [mailto:uabstarn...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Mindaugas Milinavicius > Sent: 11 April 2016 13:53 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: VM per HOST? > >

RE: VM per HOST?

ubject: Re: VM per HOST? Thank you, i'm thinking something like that too. Pagarbiai Mindaugas Milinavičius UAB STARNITA Direktorius http://www.clustspace.com LT: +37068882880 RU: +79651806396 Tomorrow's posibilities today <http://www.clustspace.com/> - 1 Core,

Re: VM per HOST?

Thank you, i'm thinking something like that too. Pagarbiai Mindaugas Milinavičius UAB STARNITA Direktorius http://www.clustspace.com LT: +37068882880 RU: +79651806396 Tomorrow's posibilities today - 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: R

Re: VM per HOST?

In our case (general purpose VMs) we decided to have the system's RAM as the reference point to create our VM limit. For example, if the server has 128GBs of RAM and the default VM profile is 1 vCPU + 4Gbs RAM, then our upper limit is roughly 30VMs per server. Over provisioning the CPU is usua

Re: VM per HOST?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Mindaugas Milinavičius < mindau...@clustspace.com> wrote: > Hello, > > how many VM's do you creating per host? > What you prefer E5-2650v3 or E5-2630v3 (less power, 2x cheaper CPU, and > only ±20% less benchmark) > > I'd say it depends on the workload. For generic

VM per HOST?

Hello, how many VM's do you creating per host? What you prefer E5-2650v3 or E5-2630v3 (less power, 2x cheaper CPU, and only ±20% less benchmark) Pagarbiai Mindaugas Milinavičius UAB STARNITA Direktorius http://www.clustspace.com LT: +37068882880 RU: +79651806396 Tomorrow's posibilities today <