Thanks John and Krisstofer for your support.
Amin
> From: j...@stratosec.co
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why no use sync rather than async for NFS storage?
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:03:51 +
>
> Just created CLOUDSTACK-6166 to change this, or at least
Just created CLOUDSTACK-6166 to change this, or at least get a good reason for
why folks think it’s OK.
On Feb 24, 2014, at 8:57 AM, John Kinsella wrote:
> Interesting - hadn’t noticed that.
>
> Async is generally faster, at the risk of data loss as the client isn’t
> guaranteed data write on
Interesting - hadn’t noticed that.
Async is generally faster, at the risk of data loss as the client isn’t
guaranteed data write on the server. Not something I’d run in production.
John
On Feb 23, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Amin Samir wrote:
> Hello,
>
> All cloudstack documentation prepares the NFS
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: Why no use sync rather than async for NFS storage?
Hello,
All cloudstack documentation prepares the NFS share using async, why not
use sync for better data protection?
Has anyone used NFS shares with sync? what would be the drawbacks if a
Hello,
All cloudstack documentation prepares the NFS share using async, why not use
sync for better data protection?
Has anyone used NFS shares with sync? what would be the drawbacks if any?
Thanks for your valuable responses.
Amin
