Swen,
I think you are right, except maybe textual; in your case the id of the VM
is 62 and the id of the vm the volume belongs to is 26. I am assuming here
that there is no bug that transposes the digits of the id.
regards,
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 5:42 PM wrote:
> Hey all,
>
>
>
> I am playing a
Hey all,
I am playing around with usage records and I am a little bit stuck in
understanding some mappings. As far as I see it is not possible to map a
volume to a virtual machine by using the usage records only. Is this
correct, or do I miss something? Any idea?
Here is the usage records o
