Hi
Sorry, we are confused
DEB packages don't contain non-oss components?
and RPM packages for RHEL contain non-oss components?
thanks
El 12/06/13 18:34, David Nalley escribió:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Tamas Monos wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded from CS 3.0.2 -> to 4.1.
The only th
Hi Guys,
I have configured an Advanced Zone without Security Groups.
I've set up a network offering with a virtual router with the following
services:
UserData, PortForwarding, Vpn, Dhcp, Dns, Firewall, SourceNat, Lb, StaticNat
When I create a network, I get a public IP address with (source NAT
Hi Len,
While creating network offering we have an option to enable/disable conserver
mode.
If conserver mode is on we can use the source NAT ip address for port
forwarding.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Len Bellemore [mailto:len.bellem...@controlcircle.com]
Sent: Thursday,
Hi,
This is fantastic news!
Tamas
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: 12 June 2013 17:34
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: cloudstack 4.1 & vmware vsphere 5.1 works?
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Tamas Monos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have upgrade
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Jose Merchan wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sorry, we are confused
>
> DEB packages don't contain non-oss components?
>
> and RPM packages for RHEL contain non-oss components?
>
> thanks
>
I don't know about the DEB packages, as I didn't build them.
I can speak authoritatively a
That's it! thanks
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com]
Sent: 13 June 2013 11:55
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Port Forwarding and Source NAT
Hi Len,
While creating network offering we have an option to enable/disable conserver
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:14:08AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Jose Merchan wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Sorry, we are confused
> >
> > DEB packages don't contain non-oss components?
> >
> > and RPM packages for RHEL contain non-oss components?
> >
> > thanks
> >
>
> I
Hi Guys,
Anyone used the password reset utility on a Windows server?
It works great if I don't sysprep my servers. The problem is Windows forces
you to reset the Administrator password after sysprep runs and I think this
clashes with the password reset script.
I reset my password at the promp
Hi Len,
Not seen this issue, and have rolled out many Windows Sys-prepped Templates,
are you able to share more information about your workflow for creating the
template etc
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.c
It might be that the service was in the stopped state when the image was
created. This has got me a couple of times. You might want to try that one.
Sean
On 13 June 2013 17:17, Geoff Higginbottom
wrote:
> Hi Len,
>
> Not seen this issue, and have rolled out many Windows Sys-prepped
> Templates,
Hi,
I have updated our testbed from 3.0.2 to 4.1 and the password reset function
stopped working.
I have no idea whether the system-vm template change or the systemvm.iso
causing it but no passwords are picked up.
In the management server logs all looks good. No signs of error it just simply
do
Hello Jayapal
We still not have idea on how the problem?
Seems I am not alone, still have others have the same problem with KVM ,
advanced network.
Thank you very much.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:11 AM, wq meng wrote:
> Hello Jayapal
>
> Here is the nics
>
> http://pastebin.com/8Q4E09uj
>
>
Did you remember to download vhd-util from
http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util and put it in the
right path?
* build from source code: {SRC_CODE}/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/
* RPM
packages: /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/
(This used to be /u
I've already found the solution, but thank you all the same. If using XCP
1.6 as a host, you have to login into the XCP 1.6 command line and create a
soft link: "ln -s /usr/bin/vhd-util /opt/xenserver/bin/vhd-util".
BTW, vhd-util from
http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-utilis not
Hi guys,
I found Conserve mode tick box is greyed out if VPC is selected in network
offering creation window. Is this by design to separate inbound port forwarding
to a different public IP from the source NAT one?
Regards,
Yong
-Original Message-
From: Len Bellemore [mailto:len.bellem
15 matches
Mail list logo