RE: Volume scheduler

2015-01-01 Thread Anshul Gangwar
You can use tags in disk offering/service offering to put volume in specific storage pool. You can specify algorithms for volume placement. For more info refer http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX135790. -Original Message- From: Mārtiņš Jakubovičs [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tue

Re: Unable to start VM due to concurrent operation

2015-01-01 Thread Mohamed Infaz
Hi Somesh, Yes i was successful in stopping both the system vm's and starting them back i also could access them through the console that cloudstack provides. May be the reason for that code snippet is that i didn't register the template but i ran this script to install the system vm's. 1. /

Re: CPU socket miss match !!! Urgent

2015-01-01 Thread Abdul Rasool
Thanks for your support Kevin I have fine tuned cpu.overprovisioning.factor settings to manage my capacity at this movement. I am keen to know is there any other way to display the actual CPU socket count on the ACS infrastructure dashboard ? Thanks AR On 1 January 2015 at 00:38, Kevin McCormick

Re: Unable to start VM due to concurrent operation

2015-01-01 Thread Mohamed Infaz
Hi, I updated my cloudstack deployment to 4.4.2 to 4.3.1. Now when we try to deploy a VM i am getting following error message. com.cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException: Resource [StoragePool:2] is unreachable: Unable to create Vol[30|vm=58|ROOT]:com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeExcepti

Re: Unable to start VM due to concurrent operation

2015-01-01 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
The sec store has some issues, you can login into KVM host and check if the sec storage mount point is visible and the said folder is there. Check if ssvm is running fine. It is also possible that the sec store is fine but the template that is being used to create VM is in inconsistent state, th

Re: Can't create or deploy VMs

2015-01-01 Thread Prashant Kumar Mishra
For now you can set ³pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold² to 1 in global settings , and restart ms . Insufficient space on pool: 1 since its usage percentage: 0.9072490225390984 has crossed the pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold: 0.85 On 12/31/14, 11:19 PM, "Somesh Naidu" wrote: >> 20

Re: Cloudmonkey potential bug

2015-01-01 Thread Ian Forde
Note - thinking about this some more, you may want to note that it behaves as you say for pods and clusters, but not for zones. For those, only exact matches work, which is, frankly, what I’d prefer. So there’s inconsistent behavior from the API. -I On 12/31/14, 1:54 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:

Re: Cloudmonkey potential bug

2015-01-01 Thread Rohit Yadav
You should file bug reports for such things that you discover, I understand there are (semantic) inconsistencies in the APIs but since I did not implement those APIs I won't know any technical reason behind those decisions. On Friday 02 January 2015 10:54 AM, Ian Forde wrote: Note - thinking abo

Re: Cloudmonkey potential bug

2015-01-01 Thread Ian Forde
No worries - I just didn’t want to file one without having confirmation on the mailing list first. ;) Thanks again… -I On 1/1/15, 9:44 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >You should file bug reports for such things that you discover, I >understand there are (semantic) inconsistencies in the APIs but s