Hi Nitin,
thanks but i have a big problem on this vpc, because have a site to stite vpn
and often i receive this message:
site-to-site Vpn Connection to x on router r-15854-VM(id: 15854) just
switch from Connected to Disconnected
The vpn is always UP, infact does not lose ping packages, bu
Hi,
We added a new raid volume as local storage in our nodes that is faster
than the local storage we have been using so far. We would like to add
this new "Local-SSD" storage volume but it seems it is not possible
without replacing the old one. We do not want to replace the default
/var/lib
Hi Natalia,
I’ve never done this myself so can’t guarantee for outcome – so please test
this in a non-production environment – but it looks like the last tip on the
following libvirt docs page outlines what you want to achieve:
https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Tips
Please let us know if you mana
Hi Jeremy,
If you revisit the info on vhd-util this will still help you troubleshoot LVM
based storage. Another KB article you can refer to is
https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX201296 - as you can see from this the
scans will work for both (e.g. SIC #vhd-util scan –m “VHD-*” -f -c -l
VG_Xe
For these false-positive error messages:
site-to-site Vpn Connection to x on router r-15854-VM(id: 15854) just
switch from Connected to Disconnected
We also had that issue, it was a bug and is fixed in 4.9.3 by this pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040
-Origina
Hi Glenn,
1. ACS version: 4.9.1
2. Centos 7
3. XenServer 6.5
4. Storage Type: NFS
5. Storage Network 10Gb
the test is with netcat...
thanks
On 09/26/2017 08:23 AM, Glenn Wagner wrote:
Hi,
Can you give us some information about your environment?
1. ACS version: 4.9.2
2. ACS OS version: Ubun
ok, but on the same vpc i have a forwarding rules on port https 443 that hangs
and I must restart the firewall rules..and these is for me a big problem
thanks
On 09/26/2017 02:59 PM, Sean Lair wrote:
For these false-positive error messages:
site-to-site Vpn Connection to x on router r-158
Folks,
How is the status of the 4.10 release? I thought it was already released,
right?
Even though all of the CloudStack packages are in the right folders for
Precise and Xenial, it seems that only the “Release” file of Ubuntu Trusty
was updated with the new release files.
Moreover, reading the
Hi Benjamin,
Check this PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2275
Cheers,
Gabriel.
2017-09-25 5:27 GMT-03:00 Dag Sonstebo :
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Can you elaborate – what is your system VM template achieving compared to
> the standard system VM template? Are you planning on replacing the s
We are waiting for 4.10 installation and other 4.10 documentations(like
source compile) since long time there was a thread about this documentation
generation on mailing list but it looks like the problem on that step did
not solved yet, its still waiting :(
+1 for Christians & Rafaels questions
> Op 26 september 2017 om 16:23 schreef Rafael Weingärtner
> :
>
>
> Folks,
>
> How is the status of the 4.10 release? I thought it was already released,
> right?
>
> Even though all of the CloudStack packages are in the right folders for
> Precise and Xenial, it seems that only the “Release”
Thanks for the reply Wido, can you clarify the point:
>- Is Ubuntu Precise still supported?
> - If not, we must change the docs (I can open a Jira ticket and PR
> for that)
No, it's not because there is no Java 8 support there.
We deprecated support for Ubuntu Precise because it
Hello Marc-Aurèle,
we tested with the parameter host.reservation.release.period.
We didn't see any change in the free capacity after shutdown of machines. Not
even after this period.
Any idea why?
Regards,
Ingo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jochim, Ingo [mailto:ingo.joc...@bitgroup.
What version of ACS are you using?
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Jochim, Ingo
wrote:
> Hello Marc-Aurèle,
>
> we tested with the parameter host.reservation.release.period.
> We didn't see any change in the free capacity after shutdown of machines.
> Not even after this period.
> Any idea why?
If you are an enthusiast of ACS, you can take a look at:
> com.cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.start()
>
and also at
> com.cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.checkHostReservations()
>
to debug/understand the problem and the code that is supposed to remove the
"old" reservations
Hello Rafael,
we are running 4.10.
Regards,
Ingo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Rafael Weingärtner [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. September 2017 22:49
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: Free capacity calculation within ACS
What version of ACS are
Hi Ivan,
I don't think cloudstack offer cluster anti affinity and i'm sure i would
be in favor of introducing another anti affinity level, because it would
expose cluster notion to your cloud user.
Although, look at the vm provisionning strategy config, their should be a
deployment strategy that w
Ingo, I checked the code, and at first sight I did not see any bug or
problem that would cause this feature not to work.
Can you describe what you are doing, the configurations/settings, wht you
expect and what is happening.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Jochim, Ingo
wrote:
> Hello Rafael,
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
