AW: AW: KVM with shared storage

I heard some rumors about Cloudstack is on the roadmap of ScaleIO. We, as the community, need to make some buzz and create some business cases. @Lucian: Thank you very much for your mail. @Andrija: Thank you very much, too! Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche

Problem re-adding host to Cloudstack

Hello guys, we've just upgraded one of our hosts from Cloudstack Cluster, to ESXI 6.5.0, doing the following steps (Host 192.168.150.14): - Change host state to "maintenance mode" on Cloudstack - Remove the host as an infrastructure - Put the host in maintenance mode on VCenter. - Remove the host

Re: AW: AW: KVM with shared storage

That's great news, thanks for sharing. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Swen - swen.io" > To: "users" > Sent: Wednesday, 21 February, 2018 08:15:24 > Subject: AW: AW: KVM with shared storage > I heard some rumors abou

RE: Problem re-adding host to Cloudstack

Could there be a firewall rule blocking access that got put back in on reboot? You may need to tcpdump the traffic towards vsphere to see what's happening. Simon Weller/615-312-6068 -Original Message- From: Marc Poll Garcia [[email protected]] Received: Wednesday, 21 Feb 2018, 9

VR routing issues in Advanced Mode

Hello Could someone help me to identify the routing issues that we have. The problem is the traffic from different guest networks can not reach each other via the public IPs. Here is my ACS setup: ACS 4.9.3.0 (both management and agents) KVM Hypervisor based on Ubuntu 16.04 Ceph as primary

Re: VR routing issues in Advanced Mode

Hi Andrei, you dont have typo in your input, right ? if I read this correctly, the case that don't work for you is as following: VR1 ( XXX.XXX.XXX.10/26) --> Guest1 Network / VM 10.1.1.100/24 VR2 ( XXX.XXX.XXX.20/26)-- Guest1 Network / VM 10.1.1.200/24 Is this correct ? If so, it's normal t

Re: VR routing issues in Advanced Mode

Hi Andrei, You’re confusing the matter with your masking of public IP ranges. You said you have “2 x Public IP ranges with /26 netmask” – but since you are masking them out with X’s your email doesn’t make sense. If all the X’s are the same then a .10 and a .20 IP address would be on the same /

Re: VR routing issues in Advanced Mode

Hi Dag, Please see my comments below: > Hi Andrei, > > You’re confusing the matter with your masking of public IP ranges. You said > you > have “2 x Public IP ranges with /26 netmask” – but since you are masking them > out with X’s your email doesn’t make sense. If all the X’s are the same then

Re: VR routing issues in Advanced Mode

Andrija, the vms are trying to reach each other using the public IP addresses, not the private addresses. Cheers Andrei - Original Message - > From: "Andrija Panic" > To: "users" > Sent: Wednesday, 21 February, 2018 12:48:57 > Subject: Re: VR routing issues in Advanced Mode > Hi And

Re: System VM Issues 4.11?

Hi Kristian, Do you get any results if you execute the listRouters/listHosts apis using say a CLI such as cloudmonkey as the root admin? 🐵 > list routers listall=true 🐵 > list hosts Also, do you have any modifications to the UI, or webserver/middleware? I looked at the logs, and I could no

FINAL REMINDER: CFP for Apache EU Roadshow Closes 25th February

Hello Apache Supporters and Enthusiasts This is your FINAL reminder that the Call for Papers (CFP) for the Apache EU Roadshow is closing soon. Our Apache EU Roadshow will focus on Cloud, IoT, Apache Tomcat, Apache Http and will run from 13-14 June 2018 in Berlin. Note that the CFP deadline has

Re: VR routing issues in Advanced Mode

Hi Andrei, Understand. To get all the obvious things out the way – have you allowed egress traffic on the two networks (you mention ACLs which we only use on VPCs and basic networks)? Regards, Dag Sonstebo Cloud Architect ShapeBlue On 21/02/2018, 14:51, "Andrei Mikhailovsky" wrote: Hi Da

Re: VR routing issues in Advanced Mode

Dag, Yeah, we have egress traffic enabled. We also use VPCs on some of the networks and they are also effected by this issue along with None VPC networks. Any thoughts? Andrei Mikhailovsky From: Dag Sonstebo Sent: Wednesday 21 February, 18:30 Subject: Re: VR routing issues i

VHD import

Dear All, I recently lost a Xen 7 pool managed by CS 4.11 (hardware issue). I tried to apply Dag's excellent article (http://www.shapeblue.com/recovery-of-vms-to-new-cloudstack-instance/), and found a strange behavior : - If I directly export the VHD from old NFS primary storage (aft

change primary storage scope

Hello, Is there any possibility of change primary storage scope from cluster to zone? Regards, Piotr