EVPN VXLANY hosts communicate to VXLANX hosts Do we need Traditional Vlans

2025-01-06 Thread Chi vediamo
Hello Community, First: Thank you Wido, your answers on previous emails to the community help a lot. I read the vincent.bernat document, but his example uses VLAN mapping at the Switch level. I was thinking to use the LEAF-SPINE as a transport only , and the seetings on the Host will take care

Re: [D] Unable to orchestrate start VM instance [cloudstack]

2025-01-06 Thread via GitHub
GitHub user pavanaravapalli added a comment to the discussion: Unable to orchestrate start VM instance @xmlgrg seems to be an issue with the template. "Template 201 could not be downloaded on pool 1" I suggest to check the files under 201 folder on storage folder, to get some insights.

Re: [D] Account Deletion [cloudstack]

2025-01-06 Thread via GitHub
GitHub user abh1sar added a comment to the discussion: Account Deletion hi @scottsignal, I am planning to work on #9480. I agree with the problem and like the ideas. My suggestion is 1. Account has to be disabled first for it to be deleted (Disabling actually shuts down all the VMs). 2. Impro

Re: Storage traffic under VLAN

2025-01-06 Thread Murilo Moura
Hi Jithin! Could you help me with more details on how I could manually establish this bridge for use in SSVM? On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 2:36 AM Jithin Raju wrote: > Hi Murilo, > > I noticed that cloudstack does not create storage VLAN bridges on KVM. I > expect it to create it, though. You have

Re: Storage traffic under VLAN

2025-01-06 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Murilo, The steps you need to follow are: * Configure the KVM host with a bridge for the storage traffic eg: cloudbr1 * Configure a VLAN tagged interface for the storage traffic eg: eth1.500 * Add the storage VLAN interface to the bridge. * Update Cloudstack zone traffic label

Re: [D] Virtual Router to output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki or other system [cloudstack]

2025-01-06 Thread via GitHub
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Virtual Router to output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki or other system @btzq , this is not the first time this comes up. There have been implementation attempt on this as well. Maybe it is g

Re: [D] Virtual Router to output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki or other system [cloudstack]

2025-01-06 Thread via GitHub
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Virtual Router to output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki or other system I see @DaanHoogland , then can you help convert this ticket to a discussion? We can continue discussions there. GitHub link:

Re: [D] Virtual Router to output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki or other system [cloudstack]

2025-01-06 Thread via GitHub
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Virtual Router to output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki or other system fyi, may refer to #9179 GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10165#discussioncomment-117467

Re: [D] Centralised logging via rsyslog [cloudstack]

2025-01-06 Thread via GitHub
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Centralised logging via rsyslog Hi, this is something we are looking forward to! Currently monitoring VR is difficult. So we are really looking forward to it! GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9179#discussioncomm