On 27/05/16 16:21 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> The third release candidate for Pacemaker version 1.1.15 is now
> available at:
>
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/Pacemaker-1.1.15-rc3
Once gain, to check this release candidate out using Fedora/EPEL builds,
there's a COPR link
The third release candidate for Pacemaker version 1.1.15 is now
available at:
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/Pacemaker-1.1.15-rc3
Perhaps the most visible change since 1.1.15-rc2 is that many log
messages have been made more user-friendly. Partly this is due to taking
advan
Hi,
But the latest lvm version doesn't worries about the aligned?
2016-05-27 18:37 GMT+02:00 Ken Gaillot :
> On 05/27/2016 12:58 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Thanks for this info. We actually run the "noop" scheduler for the SAN
>> storage (as per menufacturer's recommendation), because
On 05/27/2016 12:58 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for this info. We actually run the "noop" scheduler for the SAN
> storage (as per menufacturer's recommendation), because on "disk" is actually
> spread over up to 40 disks.
> Other settings we changes was:
> queue/rotational:0
> queue/
Le Mon, 23 May 2016 19:21:23 +0300,
Andrey Rogovsky a écrit :
> Hi
> Any idea why it not work on my cluster?
Ok, I think I understood the problem. By default, crm_master use "forever" as
lifetime attribute. So my commands were incomplete to get live master score
set from the RA itself. Try the f
hi,
I use corosync with udpu ( since multi broadcast not work here), and want
the ability to add node dynamic.
I found this post http://www.spinics.net/lists/corosync/msg00141.html , and
tried it, but nothing happened.How can I use this feature?
Yes, with corosync 2.x (it was never backported
On 05/26/2016 08:55 PM, Stephano-Shachter, Dylan wrote:
> I tried the location -INFINITY trick and it seems to work quite well.
> Thanks for the advice.
>
> It seems to me that if I am not failing over automatically, then there
> is no good reason to run a stonith resource. Is this correct or is it