Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM standalone without crm ?

"Lentes, Bernd" writes: > wf...@niif.hu writes: > >> "Lentes, Bernd" writes: >> >>> is it possible to have a DLM running without CRM? >> >> Yes. You'll need to configure fencing, though, since by default DLM >> will try to use stonithd (from Pacemaker). But DLM fencing didn't >> handle fencing f

Re: [ClusterLabs] problems with a CentOS7 SBD cluster

25.06.2016 23:05, Marcin Dulak пишет: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get familiar with STONITH Block Devices (SBD) on a 3-node > CentOS7 built in VirtualBox. > The complete setup is available at > https://github.com/marcindulak/vagrant-sbd-tutorial-centos7.git > so hopefully with some help I'll be able t

Re: [ClusterLabs] design question to DRBD

PS. note that this is on centos 7 where drbd is not officially supported upstream and you're supposed to use lvm instead in the first place. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [ClusterLabs] design question to DRBD

On 06/23/2016 04:57 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > > What i mean with "less complicated" is that i prefer to have everything > managed by pacemaker and not some stuff by pacemaker and some stuff by init. > This is more overseeable. I'd agree to that except I am regularly locking up pacemaker-controll

[ClusterLabs] problems with a CentOS7 SBD cluster

Hi, I'm trying to get familiar with STONITH Block Devices (SBD) on a 3-node CentOS7 built in VirtualBox. The complete setup is available at https://github.com/marcindulak/vagrant-sbd-tutorial-centos7.git so hopefully with some help I'll be able to make it work. Question 1: The shared device /dev/

Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM standalone without crm ?

"Lentes, Bernd" writes: > is it possible to have a DLM running without CRM? Yes. You'll need to configure fencing, though, since by default DLM will try to use stonithd (from Pacemaker). But DLM fencing didn't handle fencing failures correctly for me, resulting in more nodes being fenced until

Re: [ClusterLabs] Informing RAs about recovery: failed resource recovery, or any start-stop cycle?

Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 06/24/2016 05:41 AM, Adam Spiers wrote: > > Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Adam Spiers wrote: > >>> Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > Earlier in this thread I proposed > > the idea of a tiny temporary file in /run which tracks the last known