Thanks, got it.
So, is it better to use "two_node: 1" or, as suggested else where, or
"no-quorum-policy=stop"?
About fencing, the machine I'm going to implement the 2-nodes cluster is a dual
machine with shared disks backend.
Each node has two 10Gb ethernets dedicated to the public ip and the adm
Andreas Kurz,
I see that you replied to my post, but I can't seem to find any text
written from you?? Can you please
re-post your reply, or message me offline at swgre...@us.ibm.com? I'm new
to the process, so
maybe something I did wrong in my post.
Thanks for your guidance.
Scott G.
Scot
On 08/30/2016 05:18 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 09:00:24AM -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 08/17/2016 08:17 PM, TEG AMJG wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I am having a problem with a simple Active/Passive cluster which
>>> consists in the next configuration
>>>
>>> Cluster
On 08/30/2016 05:46 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> illumos (and Solaris 11) delivers ksh93, that is fully Bourn compatible,
> but not with the bash extension of "local" variables, that is not Bourn
> shell. It is supported in ksh93 with the "typedef" operator, instead of
> "local".
"local" isn't Bou
On 2016-08-31 03:59, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:32:36PM -0500, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
I expect you're being deliberately obtuse.
Not sure why do you think that
Because the point I was trying to make was that having shebang line say
#!/opt/swf/bin/bash
does not guara
On 08/30/2016 01:58 PM, chenhj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a continuation of the email below(I did not subscrib this maillist)
>
> http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-August/003838.html
>
>>>From the above, I suspect that the node with the network loss was the
>>DC, and from its point of vi
On 08/30/2016 10:49 AM, Pablo Pines Leon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have set up a DRBD-Corosync-Pacemaker cluster following the
> instructions from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClusterStack/Natty adapting
> them to CentOS 7 (e.g: using systemd). After testing it in Virtual
There is a similar how-to specifi
On 08/30/2016 01:52 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Sorry for reiterating, but my main question was:
>
> why does node 1 removes its own IP if I shut down node 2 abruptly?
> I understand that it does not take the node 2 IP (because the
> ssh-fencing has no clue about what happened on the 2nd node), b
On 08/29/2016 05:34 PM, Scott Greenlese wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm assigned to system test Pacemaker/Corosync on the KVM on System Z
> platform
> with pacemaker-1.1.13-10 and corosync-2.3.4-7 .
>
> I have a cluster with 5 KVM hosts, and a total of 200
> ocf:pacemakerVirtualDomain resources define
On 08/29/2016 01:23 PM, Enno Gröper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 26.08.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Jason A Ramsey:
>> No users
>> would be connecting to the severed instances, but background and system
>> tasks would proceed as normal, potentially writing new data to the
>> databases making rejoining the nodes t
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:29:59PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Also remember that sometimes we set a "local" variable in a function
> > and expect it to be visible in nested functions, but also set a new
> > value in a nested function and expect that value to be reflected
> > in the outer s
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:53:24PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:15:49PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:08:00AM -0500, Dmitri Maziuk wrote:
> > > On 2016-08-30 03:44, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > >
> > > >The kernel reads the shebang line
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:32:36PM -0500, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 08/30/2016 11:15 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
> > I suppose that it is explained in enough detail here:
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shebang_(Unix)
>
> I expect you're being deliberately obtuse.
Not sure why do you
13 matches
Mail list logo
