Dne 27.4.2017 v 23:13 Ken Gaillot napsal(a):
On 04/27/2017 02:02 PM, lejeczek wrote:
hi everyone
I have a group and I'm trying to colocate - sounds strange - order with
the group is not how I want it.
I was hoping that with colocation set I can reorder the resources - can
I? Because .. somethin
Once upon a time, Seth Reid said:
> This is part of my multipath.conf that shows the key.
> $ cat /etc/multipath.conf
> defaults {
> user_friendly_names yes
> find_multipaths yes
> reservation_key 33c5
> }
Ah, I should have checked the multipath.conf man page (was just looking
at the fence_mp
On 04/27/2017 02:02 PM, lejeczek wrote:
> hi everyone
>
> I have a group and I'm trying to colocate - sounds strange - order with
> the group is not how I want it.
> I was hoping that with colocation set I can reorder the resources - can
> I? Because .. something, or my is not getting there.
> I h
>
> The man page talks about it
>
unique to each node (but you only create the STONITH object from one
> node, right?).
The key is unique to each node, but there is only on stonith object. For
fence_mpath, they are putting scsi keys on a shared stonith device.
It also says it has to be set in /e
I am trying to set up a new cluster using fence_mpath. I'm not sure
what to use for the "key" value though. The man page talks about it
unique to each node (but you only create the STONITH object from one
node, right?). It also says it has to be set in /etc/multipath.conf
but then doesn't say ho
hi everyone
I have a group and I'm trying to colocate - sounds strange -
order with the group is not how I want it.
I was hoping that with colocation set I can reorder the
resources - can I? Because .. something, or my is not
getting there.
I have within a group:
IP
mount
smb
IP1
and I colo
On 27/04/17 14:35, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Did you try a rebrobe, watching messages?
Regards,
Ulrich
lejeczek schrieb am 27.04.2017 um 15:29 in Nachricht
<0e1570ac-995a-371c-a05d-2c16d42cf...@yahoo.co.uk>:
.. is this ok?
hi guys,
pcs shows no errors after I did standby node, but pcs shows
r
On 04/27/2017 08:29 AM, lejeczek wrote:
> .. is this ok?
>
> hi guys,
>
> pcs shows no errors after I did standby node, but pcs shows resources
> still are being ran on the node I just stoodby.
> Is this normal?
>
> 0.9.152 @C7.3
> thanks
> P.
That should happen only for as long as it takes to
Stefan,
Hello everyone!
I am using Pacemaker (1.1.12), Corosync (2.3.0) and libqb (0.16.0) in 2-node
clusters (virtualized in VMware infrastructure, OS: RHEL 6.7).
I noticed that if only one node is present, the CPU usage of Corosync (as seen
with top) is slowly but steadily increasing (over
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:07:11 +0200
Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:19:55AM +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> > > > > I seem to remember that at some deployment,
> > > > > we set the node instance attribute standby=on, always,
> > > > > and took it out of standby using
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:19:55AM +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> > > > I seem to remember that at some deployment,
> > > > we set the node instance attribute standby=on, always,
> > > > and took it out of standby using the node_state transient_attribute :-)
> > > >
> > > > As in
> >
Hello everyone!
I am using Pacemaker (1.1.12), Corosync (2.3.0) and libqb (0.16.0) in 2-node
clusters (virtualized in VMware infrastructure, OS: RHEL 6.7).
I noticed that if only one node is present, the CPU usage of Corosync (as seen
with top) is slowly but steadily increasing (over days; in my
Did you try a rebrobe, watching messages?
Regards,
Ulrich
>>> lejeczek schrieb am 27.04.2017 um 15:29 in Nachricht
<0e1570ac-995a-371c-a05d-2c16d42cf...@yahoo.co.uk>:
> .. is this ok?
>
> hi guys,
>
> pcs shows no errors after I did standby node, but pcs shows
> resources still are being ran
.. is this ok?
hi guys,
pcs shows no errors after I did standby node, but pcs shows
resources still are being ran on the node I just stoodby.
Is this normal?
0.9.152 @C7.3
thanks
P.
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.cluster
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:33:13 +0200
Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:27:43AM +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:02:21 +0200
> > Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 03:08:55PM -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> >
15 matches
Mail list logo