06.06.2018 04:27, Albert Weng пишет:
> Hi All,
>
> I have created active/passive pacemaker cluster on RHEL 7.
>
> Here are my environment:
> clustera : 192.168.11.1 (passive)
> clusterb : 192.168.11.2 (master)
> clustera-ilo4 : 192.168.11.10
> clusterb-ilo4 : 192.168.11.11
>
> cluster resource
On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 07:47 +0800, Confidential Company wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-06-02 at 22:14 +0800, Confidential Company wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 22:58 +0800, Confidential Company wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >?
> > > I have two-node active/passive setup. My goal is to failover a
> > > resource
Hi All,
I have created active/passive pacemaker cluster on RHEL 7.
Here are my environment:
clustera : 192.168.11.1 (passive)
clusterb : 192.168.11.2 (master)
clustera-ilo4 : 192.168.11.10
clusterb-ilo4 : 192.168.11.11
cluster resource status :
cluster_fsstarted on clusterb
On Sat, 2018-06-02 at 22:14 +0800, Confidential Company wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 22:58 +0800, Confidential Company wrote:
> > Hi,
> >?
> > I have two-node active/passive setup. My goal is to failover a
> > resource once a Node goes down with minimal downtime as possible.
> > Based on my
On 31/05/18 14:48 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> I am soliciting feedback on these CIB features related questions,
> please reply (preferably on-list so we have the shared collective
> knowledge) if at least one of the questions is answered positively
> in your case (just tick the respective "[ ]"