Just minor clarifications (without changing the validity) below:
On 17/07/18 21:28 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>
> On 16/07/18 11:44 +0200, Philipp Achmüller wrote:
>> Unfortunatly it is not obvious for me - the "grep fence" is attached
>> in my original message.
>
> Sifting your logs a bit:
>
>>
Hi,
On my two-node active/passive setup, I configured fencing via
fence_vmware_soap. I configured pcmk_delay=0 on both nodes so I
>>> expected
that both nodes will be stonithed simultaenously.
On my test scenario, Node1 has ClusterIP resource. When I
>>> disconnec
"Users" schrieb am 16.07.2018 15:12:14:
> Von: "Ulrich Windl"
> An:
> Datum: 16.07.2018 15:12
> Betreff: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Antwort: Antw: Antw: Antwort: Antw:
> corosync/dlm fencing?
> Gesendet von: "Users"
>
> >>> Philipp Achmüller schrieb am 16.07.2018
um
> 14:09 in
> Nachricht
:
> >
On 07/18/2018 06:22 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 18.07.2018 04:21, Confidential Company пишет:
Hi,
On my two-node active/passive setup, I configured fencing via
fence_vmware_soap. I configured pcmk_delay=0 on both nodes so I
>>> expected
that both nodes will be stonithed s
