I report an issue opened by spritchard on Github that could be interesting:
I gather from the wiki and #699 that stopping the master with a slave running,
can leave the old master and the slave (now promoted to master) in inconsistent
states - hence why PGSQL.lock isn't removed when the master
Hi Andrei,
thanks for your interest and response.
*>> As for the disk exclusive control and fencing mechanism with Pacemaker,
*
*>> our IT vendor is proposing to use SFEX (Shared Disk File EXclusiveness)
*
*>> and fence_vmware_soap (to reset the failing node via vCenter). *
*>* * What is SFEX? I
14.09.2018 05:38, Satoshi Suzuki пишет:
> Hello,
> pls let me ask if SFEX is valid as the disk exclusive access control for
> Pacemaker clusters on VMware environment.
>
> My client is planning to configure Pacemaker HA clusters on several
> VMware vSphere 6.5 hosts.
> Each of the HA clusters cons
