Re: [ClusterLabs] Corosync main process was not scheduled for 2889.8477 ms (threshold is 800.0000 ms), though it runs with realtime priority and there was not much load on the node

2019-09-09 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 14:21 +0200, wf...@niif.hu wrote: > Andrei Borzenkov writes: > > > 04.09.2019 0:27, wf...@niif.hu пишет: > > > > > Jeevan Patnaik writes: > > > > > > > [16187] node1 corosyncwarning [MAIN ] Corosync main process > > > > was not > > > > scheduled for 2889.8477 ms

Re: [ClusterLabs] Why is last-lrm-refresh part of the CIB config?

2019-09-09 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 11:06 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > In recent pacemaker I see that last-lrm-refresh is included in the > CIB config (crm_config/cluster_property_set), so CIBs are "different" > when they are actually the same. > > Example diff: > - name="last-lrm-refresh"

Re: [ClusterLabs] Corosync main process was not scheduled for 2889.8477 ms (threshold is 800.0000 ms), though it runs with realtime priority and there was not much load on the node

2019-09-09 Thread wferi
Jeevan Patnaik writes: > writes: > >> Jeevan Patnaik writes: >> >>> [16187] node1 corosyncwarning [MAIN ] Corosync main process was not >>> scheduled for 2889.8477 ms (threshold is 800. ms). Consider token >>> timeout increase. >>> [...] >>> 2. How to fix this? We have not much load on

Re: [ClusterLabs] Corosync main process was not scheduled for 2889.8477 ms (threshold is 800.0000 ms), though it runs with realtime priority and there was not much load on the node

2019-09-09 Thread wferi
Andrei Borzenkov writes: > 04.09.2019 0:27, wf...@niif.hu пишет: > >> Jeevan Patnaik writes: >> >>> [16187] node1 corosyncwarning [MAIN ] Corosync main process was not >>> scheduled for 2889.8477 ms (threshold is 800. ms). Consider token >>> timeout increase. >>> [...] >>> 2. How to fix

[ClusterLabs] Why is last-lrm-refresh part of the CIB config?

2019-09-09 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! In recent pacemaker I see that last-lrm-refresh is included in the CIB config (crm_config/cluster_property_set), so CIBs are "different" when they are actually the same. Example diff: - + I don't see a reason for having that. Can someone explain? Regards, Ulrich