>>> Stuart Massey schrieb am 20.01.2021 um 03:41
in
Nachricht
:
> Strahil,
> That is very kind of you, thanks.
> I see that in your (feature set 3.4.1) cib, drbd is in a with some
> meta_attributes and operations having to do with promotion, while in our
> (feature set 3.0.14) cib, drbd is in a
Hi!
I have a question about utilization-based resource placement (specifically:
placement-strategy=balanced):
Assume you have two resource capacities (say A and B) on each node, and each
resource also has a utilization parameter for both.
Both nodes have enough capacity for a resource to be star
I guess I missed the OS version, otherwise I would have powered up my 3 node CentOS 7 test cluster.I will check later the settings on my CentOS 7 cluster.Last time I checked it, the drbd was running fine.Best Regards,Strahil NikolovOn Jan 20, 2021 04:41, Stuart Massey wrote:Strahil,That is very ki
Strahil,
That is very kind of you, thanks.
I see that in your (feature set 3.4.1) cib, drbd is in a with some
meta_attributes and operations having to do with promotion, while in our
(feature set 3.0.14) cib, drbd is in a which does not have those
(maybe since promotion is implicit).
Our cluster
I don't know how many/few people will be interested in this, but I have
been working on some Rust bindings for the corosync libraries: cpg, cfg,
cmap, quorum & votequorum.
They are currently in Alpha stage but all features are (I think)
implemented and seem to work. There's a little more work
