On 2/2/2021 4:02 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
I haven't used DRBD in a while, but I believe newer versions handle the
equivalent of promotion internally, rather than via the resource agent
and pacemaker. It could be that you simply don't need a promotable
clone, just a regular clone. I don't know how
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 14:27 -0700, Brent Jensen wrote:
> I've been trying to get my DRBD cluster on Centos8 / Pacemaker 2 to
> work but have had issues with cluster not failing over (I get error
> messages like "Refusing to be Primary while peer is not outdated").
> This has been explained in
Hi Team,
we have taken latest pacemaker version after that we found pcs status command
output consist of * in each line , is this expected behavior.
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/tree/Pacemaker-2.0.5
pcs status command output :
Cluster name: TEST
Cluster Summary:
* Stack:
I've been trying to get my DRBD cluster on Centos8 / Pacemaker 2 to work
but have had issues with cluster not failing over (I get error messages
like "Refusing to be Primary while peer is not outdated"). This has been
explained in other posts. In trying different things I changed my
constraint
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 06:20 +, S Sathish S wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> we have taken latest pacemaker version after that we found pcs status
> command output consist of * in each line , is this expected behavior.
Yes, this is a fairly recent change, part of an ongoing project to make
Pacemaker's
Looks like it.
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/blob/Pacemaker-2.0.5/tools/crm_mon_curses.c#L295-L301
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 9:36 AM S Sathish S wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
> we have taken latest pacemaker version after that we found pcs status
> command output consist of * in each line ,
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 16:58 +, Walker, Chris wrote:
> Yes, we use remote-tls-port for remote admin commands. Perhaps we
> should be looking into other options?
> Thanks,
> Chris
No, as long as people find it useful we'll keep it.
> From: Users
> Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 at 11:41 AM
A reasonable question from a practical on-the-ground perspective. Several
considerations contributed:
1. We need to induce the hardware errors to demonstrate the problem to
the hardware vendor, who is acting at their own pace. Leaving the node in
it's semi-active state seems to achieve
Yes, we use remote-tls-port for remote admin commands. Perhaps we should be
looking into other options?
Thanks,
Chris
From: Users
Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 at 11:41 AM
To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
Subject: [ClusterLabs] Anyone using
Hi all,
Pacemaker has a feature allowing CIB modifications to be made from
hosts that are not cluster nodes:
https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/2.0/html-single/Pacemaker_Administration/#s-remote-connection
Does anyone actually use this? If it is being used, I have no problem
There is no fix for this in the agents, so you just need to check that
you're using httplib2 v0.18.0 or later, or that your distros httplib2
package changelog mentions that the CVE has been fixed to ensure you
wont be vulnerable.
A reasonable question from a practical on-the-ground perspective. Several
considerations contributed:
1. We need to induce the hardware errors to demonstrate the problem to
the hardware vendor, who is acting at their own pace. Leaving the node in
it's semi-active state seems to achieve
I am happy to announce the latest release of pcs, version 0.10.8.
Source code is available at:
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/archive/0.10.8.tar.gz
or
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/archive/0.10.8.zip
This release brings new commands for modifying corosync configuration in
an existing
13 matches
Mail list logo
