On 19.04.2021 19:15, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>
> Well, this is a new one to me. I've confirmed that this is the
> intentional behavior, and the documentation is an oversimplification.
>
> The documentation is partly correct: a -INFINITY score means the node
> is *never* eligible to run the resource,
On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 15:02 +, Walker, Chris wrote:
> I see the same behavior as Andrei. On a two-node test cluster
> (symmetric-cluster=true, resource-stickiness=100) I configure a
> simple Dummy resource and add the rule
>
>
>
>type="number"
I see the same behavior as Andrei. On a two-node test cluster
(symmetric-cluster=true, resource-stickiness=100) I configure a simple Dummy
resource and add the rule
If I then change the value of ‘mgmt’ to zero for both nodes, the resource
stops. We
On Sun, 2021-04-18 at 17:31 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> On 18.04.2021 08:41, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > On 17.04.2021 22:41, Piotr Kandziora wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Hope some guru will advise here ;)
> > >
> > > I've got two nodes cluster with some resource placement dependent
> > >
IPMI fencing on some vendors will first try graceful shutdown and only then it
will use ungraceful.
Disabling power button is also described in
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1578823
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov___
Manage your subscription:
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 16.04.2021 um 06:56 in
Nachricht <4deaf7d9-1d38-cb03-e908-1d4f2c58c...@gmail.com>:
> On 15.04.2021 23:09, Steffen Vinther Sørensen wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 3:39 PM Klaus Wenninger
wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/15/21 3:26 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> Steffen
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 16.04.2021 um 06:51 in
Nachricht <6c407702-f3b8-a340-eb8b-f369ed784...@gmail.com>:
[...]
> Well, IPMI fencing was (claimed to be) successful, so monitoring errors
> could be false positive. Still it is something that needs investigation.
>
> ... judging by
>
>
