>>> damiano giuliani schrieb am 13.07.2021 um
>>> 13:42
in Nachricht
:
> Hi guys,
> im back with some PAF postgres cluster problems.
> tonight the cluster fenced the master node and promote the PAF resource to
> a new node.
> everything went fine, unless i really dont know why.
> so this morning
Hi Tomas ,
Thanks for the response.
As you said ,Specifying an empty value for an option is a syntax for removing
the option. Yes, this means there is no way to set an option to an empty string
value using pcs.
But our problem we have disabled root user account by default, so we are not
sure
On 13.07.2021 23:09, damiano giuliani wrote:
> Hi Klaus, thanks for helping, im quite lost because cant find out the
> causes.
> i attached the corosync logs of all three nodes hoping you guys can find
> and hint me something i cant see. i really appreciate the effort.
> the old master log seems c
In some cases the third location has a single IP and it makes sense to use it
as QDevice. If it has multiple network connections to that location - use a
full blown node .
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 20:44, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On 13.07.2021 19:52, Gerry R Som
On 13.07.2021 19:52, Gerry R Sommerville wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am currently comparing using QDevice vs adding a 3rd host to my
> even-number-node cluster and I am wondering about the details concerning
> network
> communication.
> For example, say my cluster is utilizing multiple heartbea
Hello everyone,
I am currently comparing using QDevice vs adding a 3rd host to my even-number-node cluster and I am wondering about the details concerning network communication.For example, say my cluster is utilizing multiple heartbeat rings. Would the QDevice take into account and use the IPs s
On 12/07/2021 23:27, Kiril Pashin wrote:
Hi ,
is it valid to use the same network adapter interface on the same host to be
part of multiple
heart beat rings ?
There should be no problem from technical side, but I wouldn't call this
use case "valid". Idea of multiple rings is to have multiple i
Hi ,
is it valid to use the same network adapter interface on the same host to be part of multiple
heart beat rings ?
The scenario is hostA has eth0 ( ip 192.10.10.1 ) interface and hostB has eth0 ( 192.20.20.1 ) and eth1 ( 192.20.20.2 ) .
Are there any restrictions to form two heartbeat rings
On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 14:46 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 5:50 PM wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 12:34 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
> > > Hi Admins(of this mailing list)
> > >
> > > Could you please fix in DMARC(s) so those of us who are on
> > > Yahoo would be able to
On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 10:23 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > > > schrieb am 12.07.2021 um 16:50 in
> > > > Nachricht
>
> <08471514b28d1e3f6859707f5951f07887336865.ca...@redhat.com>:
> > On Sat, 2021‑07‑10 at 12:34 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
> > > Hi Admins(of this mailing list)
> > >
> > > Could you p
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 1:43 PM damiano giuliani <
damianogiulian...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> im back with some PAF postgres cluster problems.
> tonight the cluster fenced the master node and promote the PAF resource to
> a new node.
> everything went fine, unless i really dont know why.
> s
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 5:50 PM wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 12:34 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
> > Hi Admins(of this mailing list)
> >
> > Could you please fix in DMARC(s) so those of us who are on
> > Yahoo would be able to receive own emails/thread.
> >
> > many thanks, L.
>
> I suppose we should
Hi guys,
im back with some PAF postgres cluster problems.
tonight the cluster fenced the master node and promote the PAF resource to
a new node.
everything went fine, unless i really dont know why.
so this morning i noticed the old master was fenced by sbd and a new master
was promoted, this happen
Dne 09. 07. 21 v 7:29 S Sathish S napsal(a):
Hi Team,
we have find the cause of this problem as per below changelog pcs
resource update command doesn’t support empty meta_attributes anymore.
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/blob/0.9.169/CHANGELOG.md
pcs resource update does not create an e
>>> schrieb am 12.07.2021 um 16:53 in Nachricht
<376475adc8217a97adf9374d0aad0317eabd5f90.ca...@redhat.com>:
> On Mon, 2021‑07‑12 at 08:35 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> We had some problem in the cluster that prevented live migration of
>> VMs. As a consequence the cluster migrated the
>>> schrieb am 12.07.2021 um 16:50 in Nachricht
<08471514b28d1e3f6859707f5951f07887336865.ca...@redhat.com>:
> On Sat, 2021‑07‑10 at 12:34 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
>> Hi Admins(of this mailing list)
>>
>> Could you please fix in DMARC(s) so those of us who are on
>> Yahoo would be able to receive
On 2021/7/12 15:52, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi!
can you give some details on what is necessary to trigger the problem?
There is a ABBA lock between reflink comand and ocfs2
ocfs2_complete_recovery routine(this routine will be triggered by timer,
mount, node recovery), the dead lock is not always
17 matches
Mail list logo
