Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Inquiry - remote node fencing issue

2021-10-29 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Fri, 2021-10-29 at 18:18 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > On 29.10.2021 18:16, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > On 29.10.2021 17:53, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > On Fri, 2021-10-29 at 13:59 +, Gerry R Sommerville wrote: > > > > Hey Andrei, > > > > > > > > Thanks for your response again. The

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Inquiry - remote node fencing issue

2021-10-29 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On 29.10.2021 18:16, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > On 29.10.2021 17:53, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> On Fri, 2021-10-29 at 13:59 +, Gerry R Sommerville wrote: >>> Hey Andrei, >>> >>> Thanks for your response again. The cluster nodes and remote hosts >>> each share two networks, however there is no

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Inquiry - remote node fencing issue

2021-10-29 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On 29.10.2021 17:53, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Fri, 2021-10-29 at 13:59 +, Gerry R Sommerville wrote: >> Hey Andrei, >> >> Thanks for your response again. The cluster nodes and remote hosts >> each share two networks, however there is no routing between them. I >> don't suppose there is a

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.1.2: friendlier failed action display

2021-10-29 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Fri, 2021-10-29 at 08:24 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > > Ken Gaillot schrieb am 28.10.2021 um > > > > 17:28 in > Nachricht > : > > Hi all, > > > > I hope to release the first release candidate for Pacemaker 2.1.2 > > next > > week. > > > > One of the most noticeable changes will be in

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Inquiry - remote node fencing issue

2021-10-29 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Fri, 2021-10-29 at 13:59 +, Gerry R Sommerville wrote: > Hey Andrei, > > Thanks for your response again. The cluster nodes and remote hosts > each share two networks, however there is no routing between them. I > don't suppose there is a configuration parameter we can set to tell >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Inquiry - remote node fencing issue

2021-10-29 Thread Gerry R Sommerville
Hey Andrei,  Thanks for your response again. The cluster nodes and remote hosts each share two networks, however there is no routing between them. I don't suppose there is a configuration parameter we can set to tell Pacemaker to try communicating with the remotes using multiple IP addresses? 

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.1.2: friendlier failed action display

2021-10-29 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> "Ulrich Windl" schrieb am 29.10.2021 um 08:24 in Nachricht <617b939902a100044...@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>: ... > > Also: What about option -J, --as-json? ;-) > And it the structure of the XML output formally described somewhere? s/it/is/ # Sorry

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Inquiry ‑ remote node fencing issue

2021-10-29 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 28.10.2021 um 20:58 in Nachricht : > On 28.10.2021 20:13, Gerry R Sommerville wrote: >> >> What we also found to be interesting is that if the cluster is only using a >> single heartbeat ring, then srv‑2 will get fenced instead, and the > > So as already

[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.1.2: friendlier failed action display

2021-10-29 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 28.10.2021 um 17:28 in Nachricht : > Hi all, > > I hope to release the first release candidate for Pacemaker 2.1.2 next > week. > > One of the most noticeable changes will be in failed action displays in > crm_mon. (This change will *not* show up if Pacemaker is built