On 30.08.2023 19:23, David Dolan wrote:
Use fencing. Quorum is not a replacement for fencing. With (reliable)
fencing you can simply run pacemaker with no-quorum-policy=ignore.
The practical problem is that usually the last resort that will work
in all cases is SBD + suicide and SBD cannot work
> Hi All,
> >
> > I'm running Pacemaker on Centos7
> > Name: pcs
> > Version : 0.9.169
> > Release : 3.el7.centos.3
> > Architecture: x86_64
> >
> >
> Besides the pcs-version versions of the other cluster-stack-components
> could be interesting. (pacemaker, corosync)
>
rpm -qa | eg
>
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm running Pacemaker on Centos7
> > Name: pcs
> > Version : 0.9.169
> > Release : 3.el7.centos.3
> > Architecture: x86_64
> >
> >
> > I'm performing some cluster failover tests in a 3 node cluster. We have
> 3 resources in the cluster.
> > I was trying to
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 2:34 PM David Dolan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm running Pacemaker on Centos7
> Name: pcs
> Version : 0.9.169
> Release : 3.el7.centos.3
> Architecture: x86_64
>
>
Besides the pcs-version versions of the other cluster-stack-components
could be interesting. (pac
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 3:34 PM David Dolan wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm running Pacemaker on Centos7
> Name: pcs
> Version : 0.9.169
> Release : 3.el7.centos.3
> Architecture: x86_64
>
>
> I'm performing some cluster failover tests in a 3 node cluster. We have 3
> resources in the
Hi All,
I'm running Pacemaker on Centos7
Name: pcs
Version : 0.9.169
Release : 3.el7.centos.3
Architecture: x86_64
I'm performing some cluster failover tests in a 3 node cluster. We have 3
resources in the cluster.
I was trying to see if I could get it working if 2 nodes fail at
