gt; > > > : Lars Ellenberg
> >> > > > > : LINBIT | Keeping the Digital World Running
> >> > > > > : DRBD -- Heartbeat -- Corosync -- Pacemaker
> >> > > > > : R&D, Integration, Ops, Consulting, Support
> >> > >
> > > > > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
> > > > > http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > > > >
> > > > > Project Home: http://www.clusterla
, no fencing will
> be done...
> As far as I understand pacemaker, a fencing request cannot be revoked once
> issued (it's in the queue of actions).
Yeah, that strict sequential operating can be a major PITA, especially if
the reason for whatever action has long gone.
Christian
; On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:30:30PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > 2nd post in 10 years, lets see if this one gets an answer unlike the
> > > > first
> > > > one...
> >
&g
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:52:04 +0200 Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:30:30PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> >
an a handful of processes per FS who
can't afford to wait hours the new routine to finish?
2. Can we have the old FUSER (kill) mode back?
Regards,
Christian
--
Christian BalzerNetwork/Systems Engineer
ch...@gol.com
