wrong on the initial
config) and had to specify the BA. Now failovers are transparent to all hosts
and I'm calling the project done! Thanks to those who got me thinking!
Dave D.
From: Users on behalf of Dave Withheld
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2022 5:39
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:03 AM Dave Withheld
mailto:davewithh...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
In our production factory, we run a 2-node cluster on CentOS 8 with pacemaker,
a virtual IP, and drbd for shared storage with samba (among other services)
running as a resource on the active node. Ever
In our production factory, we run a 2-node cluster on CentOS 8 with pacemaker,
a virtual IP, and drbd for shared storage with samba (among other services)
running as a resource on the active node. Everything works great except when
we fail over. All resources are moved to the other node and st
-source clustering welcomed
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Corosync over dedicated interface?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 11:37 AM Dave Withheld wrote:
>
> Is it possible to get corosync to use the private network and stop trying to
> use the LAN for cluster communications? Or am I totally off-ba
I am setting up a high availability two-node, master/slave cluster using drbd
for shared data using CentOS 8 stream. The two nodes are identical and either
can be master or slave with the master having the drbd device mounted and the
slave mirroring the data and standing ready to take on the mas
