package shipped with
RHEL includes some bundled rubygems, including rack. Upgrading the
rack rubygem and rebuilding the PCS package were necessary to resolve
the CVEs in that specific scenario.
Regards,
Ondrej
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 at 15:18, S Sathish S wrote:
>
> Hi Tomas/Team,
>
>
. I guess `crm_resource --move --master` creates
a location constraint with `role="Promoted"` and doesn't take into
account the currently used schema. However, I'm unable to test this
theory as I don't have any testing environment available at the
moment.
Ondrej
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 0
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 16:20, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 17:28 +, lejeczek via Users wrote:
> > Hi guys
> >
> > I'm having problems with cluster on new CentOS Stream 9 and
> > I'd be glad if you can share your thoughts.
> >
> > -> $ pcs resource move c8kubermaster2 swir
> >
aker/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Explained/s-resource-options.html#_resource_meta_attributes
To determine _when_ this state should be enabled and disabled would be a
different story.
--
Ondrej Famera
___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists
iable passed to it. If you can reproduce the
same issue you can try to dump all variables to file when validation
fails (take inspiration from function 'dump_env()' of Dummy resource).
So if you wanna check what attributes were set around the time of
deletion have a look at /var/lib/pacemak
m_simulate'. Will there be some indication why the
resources are not moving like 'blocked-shutdown-lock' or they will just
appear as not moving (Stopped)?
Will this look differently from situation where for example the resource
is just not allowed by constraint to run on other nodes?
Thanks for heads up
--
Ond
node that will be using them you
can use constraints to move fence devices to opposite node.
--
Ondrej Famera
___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
ered a good practice. Important to understand
is that you configure where the cluster will run 'monitor' check of IPMI
device. That means you will be monitoring readiness of node1 to use
node2 IPMI device and readiness of node2 to use node1 IPMI device.
--
Ondrej Famera
__
Hello Strahil,
On 2/17/20 3:39 PM, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
Hello Ondrej,
thanks for your reply. I really appreciate that.
I have picked fence_multipath as I'm preparing for my EX436 and I can't know
what agent will be useful on the exam.
Also ,according to https://access.redhat.com/solutions
ding the failures.
Thank for answering my question.
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
--
Ondrej Famera
___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
ature' as suggested by LSB specification below. However I would like
to verify that this works as expected.
http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/LSB_5.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html
--
Ondrej
___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
to 'stop'.
--
Ondrej
___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
? :)
Thanks for any info
--
Ondrej
___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
glad that mystery is resolved.
--
Ondrej
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 2:23 PM Rohit Saini
mailto:rohitsaini111.fo...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
Finally found some lead on this.. We started tcpdump on my machine
to understand the IPMI traffic. Attaching the capture for your
refe
On 4/3/19 6:10 PM, Rohit Saini wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
Please find my reply below:
1.
*Stonith configuration:*
[root@orana ~]# pcs config
Resource: fence-uc-orana (class=stonith type=fence_ilo4)
Attributes: delay=0 ipaddr=fd00:1061:37:9002:: lanplus=1 login=xyz
passwd=xyz pcmk_host_list=orana
On 02/19/2018 11:25 PM, Dileep V Nair wrote:
> Hello Ondrej,
>
> I am still having issues with my DB2 HADR on Pacemaker. When I do a
> db2_kill on Primary for testing, initially it does a restart of DB2 on
> the same node. But if I let it run for some days and then try the same
On 02/01/2018 07:24 PM, Dileep V Nair wrote:
> Thanks Ondrej for the response. I have set the PEER_WINDOWto 1000 which
> I guess is a reasonable value. What I am noticing is it does not wait
> for the PEER_WINDOW. Before that itself the DB goes into a
> REMOTE_CATCHUP_PENDING state a
EER_WINDOW which gives a bit more safety.
(the table in link above also explains how much safer it is)
Instead of changing the resource agent I would rather suggest checking
the PEER_WINDOW and HADR_TIMEOUT variables in DB2. They determine how
long it is possible to do takeover 'by
hit any any issues feel free to open issue on Github.
--
Ondrej Faměra
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org
19 matches
Mail list logo