Re: [ClusterLabs] [corosync] Master branch

2016-10-11 Thread Jan Friesse
I've just committed a bit patch to the master branch of corosync - it is now all very experimental, and existing pull requests against master might need to be checked. This starts the work on what will hopefully Thanks Chrissie, nice work. I must highlight "it is now all very experimental". Of

Re: [ClusterLabs] [corosync] Master branch

2016-10-11 Thread Christine Caulfield
On 11/10/16 12:07, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 11.10.2016 12:42, Christine Caulfield wrote: >> I've just committed a bit patch to the master branch of corosync - it is >> now all very experimental, and existing pull requests against master >> might need to be checked. This starts the work on

Re: [ClusterLabs] [corosync] Master branch

2016-10-11 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 11.10.2016 12:42, Christine Caulfield wrote: > I've just committed a bit patch to the master branch of corosync - it is > now all very experimental, and existing pull requests against master > might need to be checked. This starts the work on what will hopefully > become corosync 3.0 > > The co

[ClusterLabs] [corosync] Master branch

2016-10-11 Thread Christine Caulfield
I've just committed a bit patch to the master branch of corosync - it is now all very experimental, and existing pull requests against master might need to be checked. This starts the work on what will hopefully become corosync 3.0 The commit is to make Kronosnet the new, default, transport for co