Re: [ClusterLabs] A systemd resource monitor is still in progress: re-scheduling

2021-06-13 Thread wenjian zhang
Sometimes systemctl status command maybe delay, but never more than 3 seconds, so monitor timeout=100s can be thought enough? And is monitor-still-in-progress-and-re-scheduling the reason for pacemaker to stop an already active cinder service? ___ Manage

Re: [ClusterLabs] A systemd resource monitor is still in progress: re-scheduling

2021-06-13 Thread Strahil Nikolov
Did you notice any delay in 'systemctl status openstack-cinder-scheduler' ? As far as I know the cluster will use systemd (or even maybe dbus) to get the info of the service. Also, 10s monitor intercal seems quite aggressive - have you considered increasing that ? Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov

Re: [ClusterLabs] A systemd resource monitor is still in progress: re-scheduling

2021-06-14 Thread kgaillot
On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 22:43 +0800, Acewind wrote: > Dear guys, > I'm using pacemaker-1.1.20 to construct an openstack HA system. > After I stop&start the cluster, pcs monitor operation always be in > progress for cinder-volume & cinder-scheduler service. But the > systemd service is active and ope

Re: [ClusterLabs] A systemd resource monitor is still in progress: re-scheduling

2021-06-14 Thread Acewind
The whole histroy operations: I started systemd cinder-volume service resource manually on node host001, then restart pcs cluster. Pacemaker stops my cinder-volume service on host001, then cinder resources are always shown stopped, never been started again. 于2021年6月14日周一 下午11:20写道: > On Sun, 202