On 10.10.2021 14:29, martin doc wrote:
> ok, I think I've solved my problem or at least part of it.
>
> The issue was I was not including a "score" in any of my constraint
> statements. This meant that "INFINITY" was being used. The result is that the
> scores would always be the same.
>
ok, I think I've solved my problem or at least part of it.
The issue was I was not including a "score" in any of my constraint statements.
This meant that "INFINITY" was being used. The result is that the scores would
always be the same.
e.g.
pcs colocation location App with VIP
gets a score
From: Andrei Borzenkov, 9 October 2021 5:40 PM
> What is the value of placement-strategy cluster property?
"balanced".
I unset that and there was a flurry of activity but nothing changed.
Interesting in the pacemaker log for the host that is "empty" is that it
started the MyGw clone up locally
Hi,
Yes, the suggestion to use a rule helped some. I had tried that but what I got
wrong is that the name for the score stored by ping is not ping but pingd (yay
backwards compat.) Thanks Ken for the pointer and getting me to go back to that.
Now I'm stuck with the problem of getting resources
>>> martin doc schrieb am 07.10.2021 um 17:45 in
Nachricht
:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to work out if it is possible to leave a resource on the
> cluster node that it is on and only move it to another node if a dependent
> resource is started. This is all using Red Hat's presentation in
