Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Peer (slave) node deleting master's transient_attributes

2021-02-09 Thread Stuart Massey
Ulrich, Thank you for clarifying what single-node maintenance mode entails. It is surprising to learn that, though resource actions do not happen, a node would send a cib update that deletes the transient attributes that are maintained by resource monitoring activities. I think "maintenance mode"

[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Peer (slave) node deleting master's transient_attributes

2021-02-08 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! Maybe you just misunderstand what maintennce mode for a single node means: CIBS updates will still be performed, but not the resource actions. If CIB updates are sent to another node, that node will perform actions. Maybe just explain what you really want to do with one node in maintenance

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Peer (slave) node deleting master's transient_attributes

2021-02-02 Thread Stuart Massey
A reasonable question from a practical on-the-ground perspective. Several considerations contributed: 1. We need to induce the hardware errors to demonstrate the problem to the hardware vendor, who is acting at their own pace. Leaving the node in it's semi-active state seems to achieve

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Peer (slave) node deleting master's transient_attributes

2021-02-02 Thread Stuart Massey
A reasonable question from a practical on-the-ground perspective. Several considerations contributed: 1. We need to induce the hardware errors to demonstrate the problem to the hardware vendor, who is acting at their own pace. Leaving the node in it's semi-active state seems to achieve

[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Peer (slave) node deleting master's transient_attributes

2021-02-01 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 01.02.2021 um 17:27 in Nachricht <9b99d08faf4ddbe496ede10165f586afd81aa850.ca...@redhat.com>: > On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 11:16 -0500, Stuart Massey wrote: >> Andrei, >> You are right, thank you. I have an earlier thread on which I posted >> a pacemaker.log for this issue,