Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

2018-01-17 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 08:32 +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > > Ken Gaillot schrieb am 16.01.2018 um > > > > 23:33 in Nachricht > > <1516142036.5604.3.ca...@redhat.com>: > > As we look to release Pacemaker 2.0 and (separately) update the OCF > > standard, this is a good time to revisit the termino

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

2018-01-17 Thread Adam Spiers
Ulrich Windl wrote: Ken Gaillot schrieb am 16.01.2018 um 23:33 in Nachricht <1516142036.5604.3.ca...@redhat.com>: As we look to release Pacemaker 2.0 and (separately) update the OCF standard, this is a good time to revisit the terminology and syntax we use for master/slave resources. I think

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

2018-01-16 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 16.01.2018 um 23:33 in >>> Nachricht <1516142036.5604.3.ca...@redhat.com>: > As we look to release Pacemaker 2.0 and (separately) update the OCF > standard, this is a good time to revisit the terminology and syntax we > use for master/slave resources. > > I think the