On 11/10/16 08:22, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 11.10.2016 09:31, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Klaus Wenninger schrieb am 10.10.2016 um
> 20:04 in
>> Nachricht <936e4d4b-df5c-246d-4552-5678653b3...@redhat.com>:
>>> On 10/10/2016 06:58 PM, Eric Robinson wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. So
11.10.2016 09:31, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Klaus Wenninger schrieb am 10.10.2016 um
20:04 in
Nachricht <936e4d4b-df5c-246d-4552-5678653b3...@redhat.com>:
On 10/10/2016 06:58 PM, Eric Robinson wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. So what's the easiest way to ensure
that the
cluster waits a desired
>>> Klaus Wenninger schrieb am 10.10.2016 um 20:42 in
Nachricht <0713ae34-7606-a82b-47f8-5cc64bfca...@redhat.com>:
> On 10/10/2016 08:35 PM, Eric Robinson wrote:
>> Basically, when we turn off a switch, I want to keep the cluster from
> failing over before Linux bonding has had a chance to recove
>>> Klaus Wenninger schrieb am 10.10.2016 um 20:04 in
Nachricht <936e4d4b-df5c-246d-4552-5678653b3...@redhat.com>:
> On 10/10/2016 06:58 PM, Eric Robinson wrote:
>> Thanks for the clarification. So what's the easiest way to ensure that the
> cluster waits a desired timeout before deciding that a