On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 13:01 +, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
> Have you tried on-fail=ignore option ?
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
on-fail=ignore will act as if the operation succeeded, which probably
isn't desired here. It's usually used for flaky/buggy devices/agents
that sometimes (or alwa
Have you tried on-fail=ignore option ?
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
В неделя, 17 януари 2021 г., 20:45:27 Гринуич+2, Digimer
написа:
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out how to define a resource such that if it
fails in any way, it will not cause pacemaker self self-fence. The
reason
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out how to define a resource such that if it
fails in any way, it will not cause pacemaker self self-fence. The
reasoning being that there are relatively minor ways to fault a single
resource (these are VMs, so for example, a bad edit to the XML
definition renders it
