Re: [ClusterLabs] Filesystem Resource Device Naming Convention

2023-04-21 Thread Tyler Phillippe via Users
LVM (currently) isn't an option for us since most of the team is unfamiliar with it. We use Puppet to push out the multipath.conf and are trying to prevent against a badly written or changed config file being pushed to the PCS servers - that's what I meant by corruption, more so than actual bit

Re: [ClusterLabs] Filesystem Resource Device Naming Convention

2023-04-20 Thread Reid Wahl
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 1:49 PM Tyler Phillippe via Users wrote: > > Hello all, > > In my position, we are running several PCS clusters that host NFS shares and > their backing disks are SAN LUNs. We have been using the > /dev/mapper/ name as the actual device when defining a PCS > Filesystem

[ClusterLabs] Filesystem Resource Device Naming Convention

2023-04-20 Thread Tyler Phillippe via Users
Hello all, In my position, we are running several PCS clusters that host NFS shares and their backing disks are SAN LUNs. We have been using the /dev/mapper/ name as the actual device when defining a PCS Filesystem resource; however, it was brought up that potentially the multipath