On 05/05/2023 10:41, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 10:08:17 +0200
lejeczek via Users wrote:
On 25/04/2023 14:16, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 12:32:45 +0200
lejeczek via Users wrote:
I've been looking up and fiddling with this RA
On Fri, 5 May 2023 10:08:17 +0200
lejeczek via Users wrote:
> On 25/04/2023 14:16, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 12:32:45 +0200
> > lejeczek via Users wrote:
> >
> >> I've been looking up and fiddling with this RA but
> >> unsuccessfully so far, that I
On 25/04/2023 14:16, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 12:32:45 +0200
lejeczek via Users wrote:
I've been looking up and fiddling with this RA but
unsuccessfully so far, that I wonder - is it good for
current versions of pgSQLs?
As far as I know, the pgsql agent
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 12:32:45 +0200
lejeczek via Users wrote:
> I've been looking up and fiddling with this RA but
> unsuccessfully so far, that I wonder - is it good for
> current versions of pgSQLs?
As far as I know, the pgsql agent is still supported, last commit on it happen
in Jan
Hi guys.
I've been looking up and fiddling with this RA but
unsuccessfully so far, that I wonder - is it good for
current versions of pgSQLs?
many thanks, L.g___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users