[ClusterLabs] Possible intrusive change in bundles for 2.0.3

2019-06-06 Thread Ken Gaillot
Hi all, It has been discovered that newer versions of selinux-policy prevent bundles in pacemaker 2.0 from logging. I have a straightforward fix, but it means that whenever a cluster is upgraded from pre-2.0.3 to 2.0.3 or later, all active bundles will restart once the last older node leaves the c

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible intrusive change in bundles for 2.0.3

2019-06-07 Thread lejeczek
On 06/06/2019 23:34, Ken Gaillot wrote: > Hi all, > > It has been discovered that newer versions of selinux-policy prevent > bundles in pacemaker 2.0 from logging. I have a straightforward fix, > but it means that whenever a cluster is upgraded from pre-2.0.3 to > 2.0.3 or later, all active bundles

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible intrusive change in bundles for 2.0.3

2019-06-07 Thread Hayden,Robert
ject: [ClusterLabs] Possible intrusive change in bundles for 2.0.3 > > Hi all, > > It has been discovered that newer versions of selinux-policy prevent bundles > in pacemaker 2.0 from logging. I have a straightforward fix, but it means that > whenever a cluster is upgraded from pre-2

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible intrusive change in bundles for 2.0.3

2019-06-07 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 10:15 +0100, lejeczek wrote: > On 06/06/2019 23:34, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > It has been discovered that newer versions of selinux-policy > > prevent > > bundles in pacemaker 2.0 from logging. I have a straightforward > > fix, > > but it means that whenever a cl

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible intrusive change in bundles for 2.0.3

2019-06-07 Thread Ken Gaillot
35 PM > > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering > > welcomed > > > > Subject: [ClusterLabs] Possible intrusive change in bundles for > > 2.0.3 > > > > Hi all, > > > > It has been discovered that newer versions of selin