Hello,
sorry for the late reply, moving Date Centers tends to keep one busy.
I looked at the PR and while it works and certainly is an improvement, it
wouldn't help me in my case much.
Biggest issue being fuser and its exponential slowdown and the RA still
uses this.
What I did was to
Hello Dejan,
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:13:11 +0200 Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:52:04PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:30:30PM +0900,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:52:04 +0200 Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:30:30PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > 2nd post in 10 years, lets see if this one gets an
Hi Lars,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:52:04PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:30:30PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > 2nd post in 10 years, lets see if this
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:30:30PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > 2nd post in 10 years, lets see if this one gets an answer unlike the first
> > one...
Do you want to make me check for the old
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:30:30PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 2nd post in 10 years, lets see if this one gets an answer unlike the first
> one...
>
> One of the main use cases for pacemaker here are DRBD replicated
> active/active mailbox servers (dovecot/exim) on Debian
Hello,
2nd post in 10 years, lets see if this one gets an answer unlike the first
one...
One of the main use cases for pacemaker here are DRBD replicated
active/active mailbox servers (dovecot/exim) on Debian machines.
We've been doing this for a loong time, as evidenced by the oldest pair
