Re: [ClusterLabs] Understanding advisory resource ordering

2020-01-11 Thread Achim Leitner
08.01.2020 17:30, Achim Leitner пишет: I can't see what is causing this behaviour. Am 2020-01-11 17:38, schrieb Andrei Borzenkov: primitive VM-Step8a Delay \ params startdelay=10 stopdelay=2 mondelay=0 \ op start interval=0 timeout=40s \ op stop interval=0 timeout=30s

Re: [ClusterLabs] Understanding advisory resource ordering

2020-01-11 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
08.01.2020 17:30, Achim Leitner пишет: > Hi, > > some progress on this issue: > > Am 20.12.19 um 13:37 schrieb Achim Leitner: >> After pacemaker restart, we have Transition 0 with the DRBD actions, >> followed 4s later with Transition 1 including all VM actions with >> correct ordering. 32s

Re: [ClusterLabs] Understanding advisory resource ordering

2020-01-08 Thread Achim Leitner
Hi, some progress on this issue: Am 20.12.19 um 13:37 schrieb Achim Leitner: > After pacemaker restart, we have Transition 0 with the DRBD actions, > followed 4s later with Transition 1 including all VM actions with > correct ordering. 32s later, there is Transition 2 with fewer actions, > but

[ClusterLabs] Understanding advisory resource ordering

2019-12-20 Thread Achim Leitner
Hi all, TL;DR: Apparently, both the order of adding resources to the CIB and the number of CPU cores on a pacemaker node might impact advisory (optional) startorder constraints. This makes it difficult to configure them for full cluster restarts, e.g. after a power outage, when the number of