Re: Cocoon 3.0-alpha sitemap properties

2012-11-05 Thread Mansour Al Akeel
Robby, Thank you for your reply. I don't see how the issue relates to the typo. Assuming this my current sitemap: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? map:sitemap xmlns:map=http://apache.org/cocoon/sitemap; xmlns:servlet=http://apache.org/cocoon/servlet;

Re: Unable to transform to docbook

2012-11-05 Thread Mansour Al Akeel
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Robby Pelssers robby.pelss...@nxp.com wrote: Hi Mansour, First of all I assume you don't have the same match patterns in the same sitemap..right? I guess you altered the implementation just to test and the first one (docbook.xsl) failed and the second one

RE: Cocoon 3.0-alpha sitemap properties

2012-11-05 Thread Robby Pelssers
Did you check if in your application context the cocoon-spring-configurator is configured? For how-to please double check the documentation. http://cocoon.apache.org/subprojects/configuration/spring-configurator/index.html !-- Activate Cocoon Spring Configurator -- configurator:settings

RE: Unable to transform to docbook

2012-11-05 Thread Robby Pelssers
You know what... It might be a problem with the includes but to be honest I would have expected another exception in that case. Is there any way you can share the sources for the project so I can adjust the dev.properties file for my situation and crack the problem? I'm sure I will find out

Re: Cocoon 3.0-alpha sitemap properties

2012-11-05 Thread Mansour Al Akeel
Robby The documentation is not very clear on this: The Spring Configurator uses Spring's extensible XML authoring features and therefore it can be directly used in your Spring bean configurations. Usually you add the configurator to your global web

Re: Unable to transform to docbook

2012-11-05 Thread Mansour Al Akeel
Sure I will. I will organize a project that is easy to play with. I will send it directly to your email (I think the list doesn't allow attachment). On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Robby Pelssers robby.pelss...@nxp.com wrote: You know what... It might be a problem with the includes but to be