Hi, can anybody point me in the right direction here?
I've been trying to dig into the Cocoon documentation, A, to get answers to
questions, and B, because I notice that a lot of things that are implemented
in the Cocoon docs are things I want to be able to do in my own projects.
So I'm trying
Good stuff, thanks! You gave me the general idea -- an internal redirect
with the parameter stuffed into the internal URL. I had to change your code
a bit to get it to work, here's what I came up with:
Main sitemap:
!--
The URL Z/index.html will either get served from the physical
I might want to do with that info.
Again, thanks for the help!
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Klortho schrieb:
Good stuff, thanks! You gave me the general idea -- an internal redirect
with the parameter stuffed into the internal URL. I had to change your
code
a bit to get it to work, here's
I'm sure this is a dumb question, but I'm kind of a newbie, and have just
spent hours looking for the answer in various books, and searching this
forum, and can't find it.
I'm trying to vary the look of my final output depending on where the source
files are stored. I have a resource-exists
I for one think that when releasing a new version, a lot of deference should
be given to the newbie. Don't make it harder to get started using.
Dropping old deprecated features might be fine, but 2.1, in addition to the
nice exception pages, had a very nice welcome page with lots of links to
Hi, I'm revisiting Cocoon after a long hiatus, and getting started with maven
and C2.2.
The first thing I've noticed is that the really nice exception pages are
completely gone. Now, if I have a problem in my sitemap or in an XSLT, for
example, all I can see is the stack trace in the console
Robby Pelssers-2 wrote:
Try adding
map:handle-errors
map:generate type=exception/
map:serialize type=xml/
/map:handle-errors
To the pipeline.
Well, thanks much for the suggestion, but it didn't work. I did some
experimenting, and tried
dhohls wrote:
That's a little harsh - although my impression is that C2.2 is
perhaps a step sideways in terms of how many things are
done... but that's just an impression from reading all the
mailing list QA. So far, I have not needed to take the plunge.
Yes, you're right ... too