sql:block

2004-06-09 Thread Patrick Schlaepfer
After the SQLTransformer and Filter the xml files looks like: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1 ? - page xmlns:sql=http://apache.org/cocoon/SQL/2.0; titleNew Books List/title - sql - rowset xmlns=http://apache.org/cocoon/SQL/2.0; - block id=1 - row id460/id hotelnameAdler/hotelname

Re: sql:block [Cocoon 2.1.5]?

2004-06-09 Thread Patrick Schlaepfer
The thing is, that it worked with Cocoon 2.1.4, and now stopped working. Anyone having sql:block running with Cocoon 2.1.5? Rui Alberto L. [ISO-8859-1] Gonves writes: On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 12:17, Patrick Schlaepfer wrote: After the SQLTransformer and Filter the xml files looks like: ?xml

Re: Coonecting to a mysql database

2004-04-16 Thread Patrick Schlaepfer
Hi Joseph Need a bit more informations about your setup. Operating system, using Tomcat... Patrick I am a newcomer to Cocoon. I would like to connect to a Mysql database. I have downloaded the JDBC driver, but I have difficulties loading the driver into the Cocoon environment and

Re: Unicode Umlauts/SQLTransformer/mySQL

2004-04-06 Thread Patrick Schlaepfer
For my part it is working now, patched SQLTransformer, that everything gets back as byte[], and now the UTF-8 characters are encoded correctly. Do know it's a hack, but if someone is interested could send my setup, or post it somewhere. Cheers Patrick

SQLTransformer/Session/Paging

2004-04-05 Thread Patrick Schlaepfer
Hi there After changing the code in SQLTransformer, UTF-8 characters are encoded correctly. Now do have another question. I'd like to store the SQLTransformer result in a session, and page thru this result-set stored in the session. Is there any HOW-TOs, or any other approach to solve this item.

AW: Unicode Umlauts/SQLTransformer

2004-03-31 Thread Patrick Schlaepfer
/SQLTransformer Le 31 mars 04, à 16:23, Patrick Schlaepfer a écrit : Made the observation that SQLTransformer, doesn't care that much about character Encoding: String retval = SQLTransformger.getStringValue(rs.getObject(i)); and then returns a new String((byte[]) object) According

AW: Unicode Umlauts/SQLTransformer

2004-03-31 Thread Patrick Schlaepfer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. April 2004 08:06 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: Unicode Umlauts/SQLTransformer Le 1 avr. 04, à 07:52, Patrick Schlaepfer a écrit : I wrote a small standalone class, to test .getString() vs .getBytes() and .getString doesn't