AW: AW: CForms Serialization

2009-01-21 Thread Christofer Dutz
esendet: Mittwoch, 21. Januar 2009 20:36 An: users@cocoon.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: CForms Serialization Hi Chris, seems that would do the trick for fields where I have validators defined in the model. I've found though it will not work eg. for fields that I have defined as being of type

Re: CForms Serialization

2009-01-21 Thread Ralph Rauscher
Rice Yeh wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Ralph Rauscher mailto:r...@blue-elephant-systems.com>> wrote: Hi, I have a case where I have a really large form that would require several sessions to be valid and I'd like to allow users to persist their work (even if the f

Re: AW: CForms Serialization

2009-01-21 Thread Ralph Rauscher
hricht- Von: Ralph Rauscher [mailto:r...@blue-elephant-systems.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Januar 2009 23:43 An: users@cocoon.apache.org Betreff: CForms Serialization Hi, I have a case where I have a really large form that would require several sessions to be valid and I'd like to al

AW: CForms Serialization

2009-01-21 Thread Christofer Dutz
form.load(previouslySavedFormData); and you should be ready to continue. Hope this helps, Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ralph Rauscher [mailto:r...@blue-elephant-systems.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Januar 2009 23:43 An: users@cocoon.apache.org Betreff: CForms Serialization H

Re: CForms Serialization

2009-01-20 Thread Rice Yeh
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Ralph Rauscher < r...@blue-elephant-systems.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a case where I have a really large form that would require several > sessions to be valid and I'd like to allow users to persist their work (even > if the form is invalid) and continue working

CForms Serialization

2009-01-20 Thread Ralph Rauscher
Hi, I have a case where I have a really large form that would require several sessions to be valid and I'd like to allow users to persist their work (even if the form is invalid) and continue working on it later. As the cforms binding will throw all kinds of exceptions in this case I thought