RE: ComponentFactory decommissioning instance

2004-02-03 Thread Leszek Gawron
But if it does not implement Poolable - what does it mean then ? Nothing bad :) It just means that everytime your action is used a new instance of your action class is created. Now if you make your action implement Poolable (which is just a marker interface) then cocoon will manage a pool

ComponentFactory decommissioning instance

2004-02-02 Thread Leszek Gawron
DEBUG (2004-02-02) 15:55.06:770 [sitemap] (/test/report-save) PoolThread-9/DefaultComponentFactory: ComponentFactory decommissioning instance of com.***.ReportAcceptor. I keep getting those messages in my sitemap.xmap. What does it really mean and how can I get rid of it. The action is quite

Re: ComponentFactory decommissioning instance

2004-02-02 Thread Jorg Heymans
Leszek Gawron wrote: DEBUG (2004-02-02) 15:55.06:770 [sitemap] (/test/report-save) PoolThread-9/DefaultComponentFactory: ComponentFactory decommissioning instance of com.***.ReportAcceptor. Does your action implement the Poolable interface? If it doesn't then there is no point setting

RE: ComponentFactory decommissioning instance

2004-02-02 Thread Leszek Gawron
Does your action implement the Poolable interface? If it doesn't then there is no point setting the pool parameters (at least in 2.0.4 it doesn't) because Action inherits straight from Component. It does not implement Poolable interface. Searching for the solution I just copied the declaration

Re: ComponentFactory decommissioning instance

2004-02-02 Thread Jorg Heymans
Leszek Gawron wrote: Does your action implement the Poolable interface? If it doesn't then there is no point setting the pool parameters (at least in 2.0.4 it doesn't) because Action inherits straight from Component. It does not implement Poolable interface. Searching for the solution I just