Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 11.05.2004 16:51, keith d. zimmerman wrote:
ok, so i'm following this thread, as it answers a question i asked
(and got no replies - wtf?) a few days ago.
Yes, I remember that one. I also had it some days lying around in my
inbox until I decided not to answer. For gene
g[R]ek already gave the answers, I just want to rephrase them a bit. See
below.
On 11.05.2004 03:33, David Leangen wrote:
IMO that's really a short, nice sitemap snippet, that might work.
If you need individual pipelines for the components, just add them.
Do you like it or does this approach a
> g[R]ek already gave the answers, I just want to rephrase them
> a bit.
>
Ah!
That's what I wasn't getting.
Thanks so much, g[R]ek and Jeorg!!
> Writing good XSLTs is heavily experienced-based...
Ok, thanks for this!
David Leangen wrote:
ok, so i'm following this thread, as it answers a question i asked (and
got no replies - wtf?) a few days ago. Now, the part I was missing was
the concept. Is there any kind of documentation on this?
I searched and searched on the cocoon si
keith d. zimmerman wrote:
David Leangen wrote:
ok, so i'm following this thread, as it answers a question i asked
(and got no replies - wtf?) a few days ago.
Sometimes, messages get missed. Best thing to do is as you did - repost.
Remember, we're all volunteers
g[R]eK wrote:
<. Hi keith! .>
Tuesday, May 11, 2004, 4:51:06 PM, you wrote:
kdz> David Leangen wrote:
kdz> ok, so i'm following this thread, as it answers a question i asked (and
kdz> got no replies - wtf?) a few days ago. Now, the part I was missing was
kdz> the c
However, it would be very cool if it did!
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Upayavira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dynamic aggregation
Reason for no docs on is because it doesn't
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dynamic aggregation
Reason for no docs on is because it doesn't exist!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman
On 11.05.2004 16:51, keith d. zimmerman wrote:
ok, so i'm following this thread, as it answers a question i asked (and
got no replies - wtf?) a few days ago.
Yes, I remember that one. I also had it some days lying around in my
inbox until I decided not to answer. For generic problem descriptions
On 10.05.2004 00:42, David Leangen wrote:
http://konova.com/ns/expedition/expedition";
label="aggregatePage">
Later in an internal-only pipeline:
Why? Because as I mentioned in my last post, using CInclude is really messy;
difficult to manage, maintain, and debug; slow to
intainability or
performance. It seems to me that one can't have both... And there aren't yet
any good design patterns to help guide me, either.
Anyway, I'm interested in hearing other people's experiences and comments on
this issue...
> -Original Message-----
>
On 11.05.2004 01:49, David Leangen wrote:
Ok, thanks Jeorg!
What you describe below seems to make good sense in the case that each XML
file doesn't need any additional processing.
Why? I used intentionally "cocoon:/component1.html" to "reuse" the
"*.html" pipeline in your helloWorld.html sample.
I can't tell you how much your comments are helpful to me!! Thanks!!!
The following sums up very well what I am attempting to do.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> src="components/{1}/transforms/html/doPresentation.xslt"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Thanks for the advice, Jasper.
I realize that one way of dynamically inserting blocks of code is to use
CInclude. I actually tried this, but it ends up being much more complicated
than it has to in many ways (maintenance, debugging, processing speed)... I
quickly got frustrated with the results,
<. Hi David! .>
Sunday, May 9, 2004, 9:28:51 PM, you wrote:
DL> I am trying to do some dynamic aggregation, but without success so far.
DL> Unfortunately, doesn't do the trick for me simply because it
DL> requires that you first know what parts you want to aggregate. In my case, I
DL> don't kn
: Dynamic aggregation
Thanks for the advice, Jasper.
I realize that one way of dynamically inserting blocks of code is to use
CInclude. I actually tried this, but it ends up being much more complicated
than it has to in many ways (maintenance, debugging, processing speed)... I
quickly got
Hi, Ralph.
> It would be helpful to me to know in a little more detail what
> you are trying to do. On what basis is it determined what should
> be dynamically aggregated?
Well, most of the usual cases cover a situation such as, for example:
++
|S
17 matches
Mail list logo
