RE: cforms validation bug?

2004-05-11 Thread JD Daniels
It looks to me like exactly correct behavior.. you are commenting out the validation rule, why would you expect it to validate after doing so? JD -Original Message- From: Isidro Vila Verde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 11, 2004 1:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cforms validatio

RE: cforms validation bug?

2004-05-11 Thread Isidro Vila Verde
Verde email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://serprest.pt/ tel: 223743701 tel: 969103006 -> -Mensagem original- -> De: JD Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> Enviada: segunda-feira, 12 de Abril de 2004 00:41 -> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> Assunto: RE: cforms validation bug? ->

RE: cforms validation bug?

2004-05-12 Thread Thomas . Zirnsack
Return Receipt Your RE: cforms validation bug? document

Re: cforms validation bug?

2004-05-12 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 12.05.2004 00:53, Isidro Vila Verde wrote: Indicate which 2 of the following drinks you'd like to receive: Shall this mean with an empty you can break the validation in the complete fo

RE: cforms validation bug?

2004-05-13 Thread Isidro Vila Verde
-> -Mensagem original- -> De: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> Enviada: quinta-feira, 13 de Maio de 2004 00:42 -> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> Assunto: Re: cforms validation bug? -> -> On 12.05.2004 00:53, Isidro Vila Verde wrote: -> -> >

Re: cforms validation bug?

2004-05-13 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 13.05.2004 14:33, Isidro Vila Verde wrote: Not exactly. It means without a it break the validation in the complete form. If I comment out the node it won't work also. Works for me. Tested it with cforms sample form1 and form1.flow. Joerg

RE: cforms validation bug?

2004-05-15 Thread Isidro Vila Verde
-> -Mensagem original- -> De: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> Enviada: quinta-feira, 13 de Maio de 2004 19:52 -> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> Assunto: Re: cforms validation bug? -> -> On 13.05.2004 14:33, Isidro Vila Verde wrote: -> -> > Not e