It looks to me like exactly correct behavior.. you are commenting out the
validation rule, why would you expect it to validate after doing so?
JD
-Original Message-
From: Isidro Vila Verde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 11, 2004 1:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cforms validatio
Verde
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://serprest.pt/
tel: 223743701
tel: 969103006
-> -Mensagem original-
-> De: JD Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> Enviada: segunda-feira, 12 de Abril de 2004 00:41
-> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> Assunto: RE: cforms validation bug?
->
Return Receipt
Your RE: cforms validation bug?
document
On 12.05.2004 00:53, Isidro Vila Verde wrote:
Indicate which 2 of the following drinks you'd like to
receive:
Shall this mean with an empty you can break the
validation in the complete fo
-> -Mensagem original-
-> De: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> Enviada: quinta-feira, 13 de Maio de 2004 00:42
-> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> Assunto: Re: cforms validation bug?
->
-> On 12.05.2004 00:53, Isidro Vila Verde wrote:
->
-> >
On 13.05.2004 14:33, Isidro Vila Verde wrote:
Not exactly. It means without a it break the validation in
the complete form.
If I comment out the node it won't work also.
Works for me. Tested it with cforms sample form1 and form1.flow.
Joerg
-> -Mensagem original-
-> De: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> Enviada: quinta-feira, 13 de Maio de 2004 19:52
-> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> Assunto: Re: cforms validation bug?
->
-> On 13.05.2004 14:33, Isidro Vila Verde wrote:
->
-> > Not e