Hello Éric,
If this file is not very complex and You don't need XPath to be
happy then You should to consider writing custom Transformer or
Generator. SAXParser interface is easy to use.
Friday, October 28, 2005, 5:30:50 PM, you wrote:
BÉ> Hi all
BÉ> I need to process large xml file and as
keeps suggestions coming.. they are appreciated.
XSLT transforms are the most obvious reason for the memory usage and speed behaviour you observe. It
is really a matter of limiting the memory usage, that will influence the performance the most. Is it
really necessary to use XSLT? Could STX be
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 28 octobre, 2005 14:43
À : users@cocoon.apache.org
Objet : Re: processing large files
hi,
have you seen Nico Verwer's presentation "Performance on big documents".
You can download it as mp3/pdf on
http://www.cocoongt.org/Slides-and-recordings.html
They use
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : 28 octobre, 2005 13:55
> À : users@cocoon.apache.org
> Objet : Re: processing large files
>
>
> You may not have to rewrite your xslt. Part of the idea is to reduce the
Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 28 octobre, 2005 13:55
À : users@cocoon.apache.org
Objet : Re: processing large files
You may not have to rewrite your xslt. Part of the idea is to reduce the
size of the document by eliminating unnecessary stuff in a transformer
before your XSL
starting rewriting the xslt (I know, I'm lazy)
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 28 octobre, 2005 11:51
À : users@cocoon.apache.org
Objet : Re: processing large files
Boisvert, Éric wrote:
Hi all
I need to process large xml fil
thanks, I saw that. I wondered if there was some obvious thing I could
check before starting rewriting the xslt (I know, I'm lazy)
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 28 octobre, 2005 11:51
À : users@cocoon.apache.org
Objet : Re:
Boisvert, Éric wrote:
Hi all
I need to process large xml file and as I tested with increasingly larger
file, the time to process suddently increased a lot. For instance, 200 K
files took 0.8 seconds, 400 K file 2.5 sec and when I get near 1 Meg, it
jumps to 30 seconds (nearly 10 times, for twi
Boisvert, Éric wrote:
Hi all
I need to process large xml file and as I tested with increasingly larger
file, the time to process suddently increased a lot. For instance, 200 K
files took 0.8 seconds, 400 K file 2.5 sec and when I get near 1 Meg, it
jumps to 30 seconds (nearly 10 times, for twi
