OK, all I did was copy an existing field and, through a process of
elimination, created the a new field similar to the old one and it
works. The only difference is the name and the position in the various
files.
Weird. I would dwell on this, but I have other things to do. Thanks for
the hel
Simone Gianni wrote:
Hi Kamal,
I can't see anything wrong with your binding, except
""
where fdvalue should be fb:value, but this would prevent your repeater
from binding correctly also all other fields in the repeater, so I
think this is a typo in your mail rather than in your form.
Try
Hi Kamal,
I can't see anything wrong with your binding, except
""
where fdvalue should be fb:value, but this would prevent your repeater
from binding correctly also all other fields in the repeater, so I think
this is a typo in your mail rather than in your form.
Try to set it required=true,
