Re: auth-protect not defined for act

2006-04-09 Thread Peter Flynn
Andrew Stevens wrote: [me] I did the default build, so I had assumed Yes. How would I recognise it? Well, for starters, there'll be a cocoon-authentication-fw-block.jar in build/webapp/WEB-INF/lib... That's there: $ locate cocoon-authentication-fw-block.jar

Re: auth-protect not defined for act

2006-04-09 Thread Jason Johnston
Peter Flynn wrote: Andrew Stevens wrote: [me] I did the default build, so I had assumed Yes. How would I recognise it? Well, for starters, there'll be a cocoon-authentication-fw-block.jar in build/webapp/WEB-INF/lib... That's there: $ locate cocoon-authentication-fw-block.jar

Re: auth-protect not defined for act

2006-04-06 Thread Bruno Dumon
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 22:05 +0100, Peter Flynn wrote: Andrew Stevens wrote: From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:03:56 +0100 I added map:action name=auth-login src=org.apache.cocoon.webapps.authentication.acting.LoginAction/ to the map:components

Re: auth-protect not defined for act

2006-04-06 Thread Andrew Stevens
From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:30:14 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter, I apologize if this has been asked before (I admit to coming somewhat late to this thread). When you built Cocoon, was the authentication-fw block selected for inclusion? I did the

RE: auth-protect not defined for act

2006-04-06 Thread Andrew Stevens
From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:05:18 +0100 ... So now that works, many thanks, but I now get the same class of error saying that auth-protect isn't defined. So taking a guess I tried map:action name=auth-protect

auth-protect not defined for act

2006-04-05 Thread Peter Flynn
Andrew Stevens wrote: From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:03:56 +0100 I added map:action name=auth-login src=org.apache.cocoon.webapps.authentication.acting.LoginAction/ to the map:components section of my sitemap Inside the map:actions, right? Yes. But --

Re: auth-protect not defined for act

2006-04-05 Thread Peter Flynn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter, I apologize if this has been asked before (I admit to coming somewhat late to this thread). When you built Cocoon, was the authentication-fw block selected for inclusion? I did the default build, so I had assumed Yes. How would I recognise it? ///Peter