Re: cocoon dependencies (was 'Distributing stand alone Cocoon apps')

2005-11-25 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 24.11.2005 00:23, Bruyn Bill wrote: Actually, I was wondering about this just the other day - I just built a 2.1.8 distribution where exclude.all.blocks=true include.block.ajax=true include.block.forms=true But find 16.7MB worth of JAR files in my WEB-INF/lib. Surely I don't need

cocoon dependencies (was 'Distributing stand alone Cocoon apps')

2005-11-23 Thread Bruyn Bill
The closest standard thing that we have is probably the standalone-demo build, with all blocks disabled except what you actually need. It's more than 5MB (around 18MB IIRC), but I think several jars are included but not used, so you should be able to trim it down (or try with 2.2

Re: cocoon dependencies (was 'Distributing stand alone Cocoon apps')

2005-11-23 Thread Mark Lundquist
Hi Bill, On Nov 23, 2005, at 3:23 PM, Bruyn Bill wrote: But find 16.7MB worth of JAR files in my WEB-INF/lib. Surely I don't need all of this... Do I? Is there some scientific way to pare this down, or must I just delete/test? You might find this of interest...

Re: cocoon dependencies (was 'Distributing stand alone Cocoon apps')

2005-11-23 Thread Derek Hohls
and 2c from the sideline: If the creator of Cocoon struggles to bring Cocoon down to size, how simple is it going to be for us unwashed masses...?! or is his plea for a cleaner, simpler build going to be taken up by someone who really knows what they are doing. It would really be great to be

Re: cocoon dependencies (was 'Distributing stand alone Cocoon apps')

2005-11-23 Thread Ralph Goers
Derek Hohls wrote: and 2c from the sideline: If the creator of Cocoon struggles to bring Cocoon down to size, how simple is it going to be for us unwashed masses...?! or is his plea for a cleaner, simpler build going to be taken up by someone who really knows what they are doing. There

Re: cocoon dependencies (was 'Distributing stand alone Cocoon apps')

2005-11-23 Thread Derek Hohls
Thanks, Ralph. I guess the developers list is the best place to "browse" to see how these issues are going to be tackled? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005/11/24 08:43 AM Derek Hohls wrote:and 2c from the sideline: If the creator of Cocoon struggles to bring Cocoon "down to size", how simple is it going